Home Blog Page 574

Brazil’s Rising Global Influence Is In India’s Interest

YouTube Video

NEW DELHI: President Jair Bolsonaro’s first state visit to Delhi has thrown up questions on the India-Brazil relationship, where it stands, and what more can be done to build up ties. Speaking to StratNews Global, Deepak Bhojwani, former Consul General in São Paulo and an analyst of Latin American affairs, tells Opinion Editor Ashwin Ahmad that Brazil is becoming an influential player on the world stage and this will work to India’s benefit, as the two countries have enjoyed strong ties for some time now. Bhojwani also points out that aside from the personal chemistry between the leaders – Prime Minister Modi and President Bolsonaro are meeting each other for the third time in the last four months – Brazil’s strategic partnership with India and its increasing ability and willingness to supply crude oil to New Delhi at a reduced cost (currently Latin America already accounts for more than 15 per cent of India’s crude oil imports) makes the South American nation more and more important to India both on the bilateral and multilateral stage.


Ghani At Davos Defends Legacy, Says Afghans Want Peace

President Ashraf Ghani on Wednesday defended his legacy of the past five years, saying the country made significant achievements in various fields including security and counter-terrorism.

Speaking on a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Ghani said that five years ago there were over 140,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan—with 100,000 of them Americans—and there were rumours that the country would collapse once the foreign forces withdrew. However, he said, all the predictions proved false and Afghanistan survived and is making progress today.

“The Afghan security forces have emerged as a significant force, our commandos are second to none in the region, our air force is tripled, our commandos and special forces have doubled. We have taken eight districts back from the Taliban,” he said.

Ghani also met a number of world leaders including U.S. President Donald Trump. According to Ghani’s spokesman, the leaders talked about the situation in Afghanistan, peace and regional security. Trump told Ghani that there cannot be meaningful negotiations until the Taliban significantly reduces violence, the White House said in a statement on Wednesday.

Ghani said that the Afghan security forces also dealt major blows to the Daesh insurgents in the eastern parts of the country. Daesh—for the first time in eastern Afghanistan—a thousand of them surrendered,” he said.

The Afghan President noted that the Afghan people are optimistic about their future, saying that prior to the presidential elections, 65 per cent of Afghans claimed to believe that the country is moving in the right direction.

On the possible withdrawal of foreign forces, Ghani said, “Security is a problem but we are going in the right direction. The Resolute Support Mission is an instrument, the key issue is the bilateral security agreement between United States and Afghanistan and the Status of Forces Agreement between Afghanistan and NATO.”

He was referring to the Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) signed between the U.S. and Afghanistan in 2014. This agreement allows the U.S. forces to remain in the country post-2014. “The numbers can adjust, increase or decrease. A decrease in this moment will have no material impact on our capacity and our willingness to ensure moving forward,” Ghani assured.

On his relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump, he said: “I have no problems dealing with President Trump. I am one of the few leaders who have an excellent relationship with President Trump, including today’s conversation we had, because I frame my relationship based on priorities.”

Peace Process

“Negotiation with the Taliban is a means. The desire of the Afghan people is to see the end of the violence. If the Taliban are ready to end the violence, the Afghan society is ready to reintegrate them,” said Ghani.

He said it depends very much on the Taliban to end the war and violence in Afghanistan. “Our security is not the responsibility of the United States. It is our own responsibility. We need to be able to secure our future. Afghan society has seen 40 years of violence. They have to see the end of violence and now it depends very much on the Taliban to end the violence,” he said.

Ghani also vowed not to tolerate what he described as ‘gender apartheid’ against Afghan women. “No Afghan woman, as long as I am alive and in the position of responsibility, is going to be subject to gender apartheid. The Afghan society has changed. Are the Taliban sufficiently ready to engage,” the President asked.

Ghani said that all wars must end politically and that there is a need to find a political end to the war gripping Afghanistan today. He said the good news is that the ranking Taliban fighters are sick of fighting.

He lashed out at the Taliban leaders in Doha: “The people sitting in Doha are getting their fourth or fifth wives and are enjoying themselves. They have become investors.”

Earlier, Taliban spokesman Suhain Shaheen told Arab News in a phone conversation that Taliban representatives are holding talks with U.S. negotiators in Qatar to create a “safe atmosphere” for the signing of a peace agreement.

“There had been no discussion on ceasefire since the beginning but the U.S. proposed reduction in violence and our stance is to provide a safe atmosphere during the days of the agreement,” Shaheen was quoted by Arab News as saying.

The reconvened peace talks between the U.S. and the Taliban are progressing, according to a Taliban spokesperson, while the Afghan government insists on a ceasefire.

(By arrangement with Tolo News)

World Powers Seek Stake In Sri Lanka

COLOMBO: World powers have sought a bigger stake in Sri Lanka as the cold war between the U.S. and China intensifies. Top officials from the U.S., China and Russia were in Sri Lanka last week for the first set of high-level talks between their respective governments and the government of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

China’s State Councillor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, and Principal U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs, Alice G. Wells, were in Sri Lanka last week for bilateral talks. The U.S., China and Russia have offered economic support to Sri Lanka, support which some fear, if accepted, will come with strings attached. Sri Lanka is seen by all three countries as being strategically located in the Indian Ocean. Wells told a select group of journalists that the fact that officials from all three countries were in Sri Lanka showed how important the country was.

During talks in Colombo, Russia agreed to take additional measures with Sri Lanka to increase trade from the current $400 million to $700 million per year. “We will pay special attention to this issue during preparations for a regular meeting of the Intergovernmental Commission on Trade, Economic, Scientific and Technical Co-operation that will take place in Russia in the latter half of this year,” Russia’s Foreign Minister Lavrov said after talks with his Sri Lankan counterpart Dinesh Gunawardena.

East Vs West

China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi told President Rajapaksa that Sri Lanka may have less landmass but will soon be strong economically and China will be with Sri Lanka as it strives to reach that goal.

The U.S. said it was in talks to provide Sri Lanka alternatives to offers from China. Alice Wells responding to a question posed by The Sunday Morning at a meeting with journalists at the Bandaranaike International Airport before leaving the country said the Hambantota deal was unfair for the people of Sri Lanka. Hambantota Port has been given to China under a 99-year lease agreement.

Wells said the U.S. remains concerned over a lack of transparency pertaining to Chinese projects in Sri Lanka, which she noted has led to an empty airport (Mattala Airport), empty business tower (Lotus Tower), and projects which suggest proper feasibility studies have not been conducted.

China’s Foreign Minister Yi had emphasised to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa that his country stands for the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Sri Lanka. “We will not allow any outside influence to interfere with matters that are essentially internal concerns of Sri Lanka,” the minister had said.

Gulf Tensions

Lavrov accused Washington of taking illegal action which reached its peak with the murder of General Qassem Soleimani, Head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ Quds Force. “This is beyond international law and humanism. We are against the escalation of tensions no matter where they emanate from. We are calling on the U.S. and Iran to display restraint and resolve all problems through dialogue,” he said, adding that “As far as I understand, the U.S. is saying it is ready for dialogue with Iran without any preconditions, although what it calls suffocating sanctions against Iran are ramping up during proposals on such dialogue. It so happens that while inviting Iran to dialogue without preconditions, the U.S. itself lays them out by subjecting Iran to pressure via sanctions.”

Wells, however, defended the killing of Soleimani, saying he directed terrorist proxies in Iraq who attack U.S. soldiers, Americans, and Iraqis. “Very few people argue to me that General Soleimani is a good guy,” she said. Soleimani took pride in his actions and there were consequences to his actions, which was his killing.

The tensions in the Gulf following General Soleimani’s killing have been a concern to Sri Lanka. Russia said it understood the concerns stemming from the negative consequences of the conflict in the Gulf area, which may affect exports of traditional goods.

“Therefore, it is in our common interests to build trust in the Gulf and beyond. This is the aim of the Russian proposal that we again presented at a special conference in Moscow last September. I am referring to the start of efforts to create a collective security system in the Gulf and around it. Let’s hope that all interested parties will start discussing ways of reducing tensions and developing neighbourly relations,” Lavorv said.

(By arrangement with http://www.themorning.lk)

Ties With Nepal: A Reality Check For India

NEW DELHI: The inauguration of an Integrated Check Post at Biratnagar on the India-Nepal border saw Prime Minister Narendra Modi ooze charm and goodwill when he said via a video link to Kathmandu: “I wish that with your cooperation and support in the new year, we take our relationship to a higher level.” He hoped “this new decade becomes the golden decade of Indo-Nepal relations.”

His Nepalese counterpart KP Sharma Oli, while thanking Modi for his help in helping build 50,000 homes for those displaced by the 2015 earthquake, raised a few eyebrows when he said “The time has come to resolve all pending issues through dialogue in the lasting interest of our two countries and peoples.”

It was seen as an oblique reference to Kalapani, the enclave at the trijunction of India, Nepal and China which Kathmandu claims and India holds. Kathmandu has been seeking a meeting at the foreign secretary level on Kalapani after India included it in a map following the bifurcation of J&K into two union territories.

Oli is also reported to be demanding that the security clause of the Indo-Nepal Treaty of 1950 be removed. The clause requires the two sides to enter consultations in the event of “serious friction or misunderstanding with a neighbouring state”, which could affect ties between Delhi and Kathmandu.

The tough line Oli is pursuing with India could be part of the traditional balancing by Kathmandu’s political elite. But given Oli’s equations with China, there may be a sense in Kathmandu that it has greater leverage to blackmail Delhi. So what does Oli want? He has New Delhi’s attention, there’s no doubt about that.

Last September the two leaders jointly inaugurated the India-built Motihari-Amlekhgunj pipeline which carries two million tonnes of petroleum products to Nepal. They are working on no less than five cross-border railway links including one from Raxaul in India’s Bihar to Kathmandu. Bus services from the temple town of Ayodhya in India’s Uttar Pradesh to Janakpur in Nepal are expected to strengthen ties of custom and tradition besides boosting trade and economic activity.

“The importance of better connectivity increases even more when it comes to India and Nepal,” said Modi, “because our relationships are not just neighbourly. History and geography have connected us with nature, family, language, culture, progress and how many more threads. Therefore, good connectivity between the two countries connects our lives more closely and opens up new avenues between our hearts.”

While Modi is making a serious bid to restore the Nepal connect, others say he needs to do more and improve timelines for completing projects if the idea is to compete with China. President Xi Jinping’s visit to Kathmandu last October with offers of billions of dollars in development aid challenges India but how much money will actually come is not clear. It is also acknowledged in Nepal that many such projects may not be viable and could saddle that country with enormous levels of debt.

Even as Nepalese debate the China link, Sujeev Shakya of the Nepal Economic Forum, says India must do more to reach out to young Nepalese who may no longer be looking to India for education or jobs. He warns that the relations between the earlier generation of political leaders of the two countries have frayed and there is less understanding and expectation from each other. Nepal’s economy has also transformed, he says; it is no longer as dependent on aid as it used to be but this is something India may not have woken up to.

No Boots On The Ground In Afghanistan: India Firm Against U.S. Pressure

NEW DELHI: There is no question of India deploying troops on the ground in Afghanistan. StratNews Global has learnt there have been a couple of requests from the U.S. during recent conversations with India at the highest political level. Those appeals have been rejected outright for several reasons. The Indian Army has told the government the blowback from any body bag returning home will have unacceptable domestic repercussions. Indian troops will be too tempting a target for Pakistan-supported terrorist groups like the Haqqani network which has tentacles spread throughout Afghanistan. Then, there is the lack of any straightforward land transit route and logistical supply lines. New Delhi has instead offered to up its engagement with Afghanistan by opening more slots for Afghan security personnel at all levels in military institutions like the National Defence Academy (NDA), Indian Military Academy (IMA), National Defence College (NDC), Officers Training Academy (OTA), Infantry Schools and the Military Intelligence Academy.

Afghan women officers training at OTA, Chennai in December 2018. (Photo: Defence PRO)

National Security Advisory Board (NSAB) member Amar Sinha, who served as Ambassador to Afghanistan from 2013 to 2016 is clear New Delhi can’t even contemplate sending troops into action in Afghanistan, “It goes against an understanding of the region, Afghan capabilities and America’s stated policy of ending this war and working towards peace. Any induction of troops will signal continuation of war rather than its winding down.”

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani (left) and U.S. President Donald Trump. (Photo: Afghan Presidential Palace)

Ambassador Sinha’s predecessor as envoy in Afghanistan Gautam Mukhopadhaya (2010-2013) is also on the same page: “If it did not make sense for India to contemplate sending troops when the U.S. and NATO were there in full force and in a stronger position politically, it makes less sense to step in when the U.S. is effectively giving up. The question of boots on the ground comes up only if there is a request. There is none, and not likely to be a consensus for it. Without a consensus, India will just be inserting itself into an internal conflict on one side or other. When our success in Afghanistan has been at least partially because we have avoided taking sides politically, it makes doubly little sense to do it militarily. Thirdly, if our goal is to bring peace to Afghanistan, sending our troops will only add to the problem. It would be far better to respect Afghan sovereignty and work to strengthen Afghanistan internally and politically, including through support for the peace process and its armed forces.”

Prime Minister Modi meeting President Ghani on the sidelines of the SCO Summit in Bishkek on June 13, 2019. (Photo: PMO India)

 

Ambassador Amar Sinha adds: “Afghan security forces are quite capable of securing the Republic though they need continued international support but not necessarily fighting troops. In this, all nations will have to commit to supporting the Afghan government and its forces as they negotiate a peace deal.”

The contours of that peace deal, as of now, seem to be an agreement first between the Taliban and the U.S. and then talks between the Taliban, the Afghan government, representatives of the political community, and civil society including women and youth. The Taliban issued a statement on January 21 specifying that talks are continuing in Doha between the U.S. Special Representative Zalmay Khalilzad, NATO commander General Scott Miller, Taliban political office head Mullah Baradar, Taliban chief negotiator Sher Abbas Stanekzai and team member Amir Khan Muttaqi, who was earlier reported to have been dropped from the negotiating team. The statement says detailed discussions about upcoming steps are taking place. The Afghan government though has doubled down on its position that the Taliban must agree to a ceasefire not a ‘reduction in violence’ before a deal.

President Donald Trump with President Ashraf Ghani at Bagram Air Force Base in November last year. (Photo: Afghan President’s Office

Ambassador Sinha agrees, “The Taliban offer of a ten-day window of a ‘reduction of violence’ falls woefully short of the expectations of the Afghan nation and what President Trump also demanded during his Christmas visit to Bagram. On the face of it, it appears to be a non-serious offer and perhaps even a mockery. However, one should not judge the Taliban only by their public utterances and give them the benefit of doubt and use this opportunity to start intra-Afghan talks. Whether they are serious about negotiations would become clear very soon. The Taliban should know that such undefinable offers are exposing their own weakness and lack of cohesion within the ranks. Legitimate questions will also arise on the limits of control of the Taliban leadership on the war fighting machinery on the ground.”

Still from Taliban propaganda video of military training released on January 21, 2020.

Ambassador Mukhopadhaya adds, “A ‘reduction in violence’ sounds good but it is vague. Reduction in violence against whom? From reports so far it seems that the Taliban are negotiating a cessation in violence against U.S. troops and a reduction in violence against Afghan forces. But Afghans should be at the centre of the ceasefire and it should be symmetrical. Otherwise, it just serves the Taliban strategy of seeking asymmetrical military advantage (not a reciprocal one) over the Afghan security forces. In other words, as of now it seems, the Taliban are only trying to eliminate the U.S. from the equation without the reciprocal removal of Pakistani support!”

 

‘We Are Broadening The Russia-India Dialogue’

YouTube Video

NEW DELHI: The Valdai Discussion Club has for the last 15 years served as a platform to discuss some of the world’s most pressing issues ranging from connectivity to development. India joined the club last year, the aim being to take the India-Russia bilateral dialogue into a broader discussion area where many other countries are present. StratNews Global spoke to Timofei Bordachev, programme director of the club, on the direction of India-Russia ties, and the challenge posed by China’s rise.


Reining In Pakistan: Thinking Beyond Military Options

“Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.”

                                           —Sun Tzu on the ‘Art of War’ (III.2)

MUMBAI: India’s relations with Pakistan have been frosty for the last many years. When India isn’t actually fighting the Pakistani strategy of death by a thousand cuts to India, there are routine border skirmishes, perception wars and narrative propaganda to deal with.

Pakistan has been fighting asymmetric battles with India for many years. The Indian posture has traditionally been defensive. Except in the last few years, when India has militarily punished Pakistan for its misadventures, even the conventional defence options had been an anathema. But there is a range of other, non-military options, which can also be deployed.

These options all arise from the fact that Pakistan is a “jelly state” to quote veteran journalist MJ Akbar. On the various dimensions that Pakistan is unstable, the most notable is the economic one. The Pakistani economy, despite the headline gross domestic product (GDP) growth, has been beset with several issues, many of these structural. Understanding these challenges can help India devise economic counters to Pakistan to hollow it out.

Despite low living standards, the private consumption in Pakistan is 82 per cent of its GDP. It has been the same for the last three years. The Gross Fixed Capital Formation as a percentage of the GDP, an indicator of investor confidence in the future, is down from 14.8 per cent in FY 2004 to 13.8 per cent in FY 2019. Normally, the central bank should reduce interest rates to spur investments in such a case. But the Pakistani State Bank (PSB) benchmark rates are now over 13 per cent. These rates are necessitated to arrest the downfall of Pakistani Rupee (PKR) and attract remittances, a key ingredient of the country’s forex reserves.

However, despite this high rate of borrowing, inflation in Pakistan has been intractable. In the last financial year, inflation has been well over 6 per cent, even touching 12 per cent at times. Despite the remittances flowing in and interest rates at multi-year highs, PKR has slid 50 per cent against the United States Dollar (USD) over the last five years. This increases the cost of foreign borrowing for Pakistan, which is already at 32 per cent of the GDP. Pakistan’s external debt is more than four times its forex reserves and debt servicing outflow accounts for 14 per cent of Pakistan’s foreign exchange earnings (up from 8.5 per cent in 2016) . In the next few years, if the PKR continues to fall and growth remains anaemic, servicing the foreign debt might well become unsustainable.

Low growth, high inflation, sliding currency, high cost of internal borrowing and unsustainable external borrowings. What can India do to leverage if not hasten this perfect storm?

Imposing High Cost Of External Borrowing

Pakistan’s external debt was around PKR 12 trillion or about $81 billion at the end of September 2019. Of these about $6-7 billion was in the form of Euro/Sukuk global bonds, some of which (over US $3 bn) are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.

India should explore the feasibility of using our own financial institutions to increase borrowing costs for Pakistan on these bourses, which in turn will have a trickle impact on its other commercial borrowings. This can be done by a combination of shorting Pakistani bonds on these bourses, and/ or buying credit default swaps on these bonds in a time targeted manner, focusing around the borrowing schedule of Pakistan. As the bond prices fall, the yields will rise, making it tougher for the country to borrow afresh.

To cover for the rising cost of borrowing, Pakistan will have to deploy its foreign exchange reserves, which are already depleting but for the remittances it gets. It will also push Pakistan to increasingly depend on bail-outs from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and U.A.E., countries that are facing dynamic geopolitical pressures of their own.

India is currently sitting on its highest foreign exchange reserves ever, so using some of these reserves for a financial engineering operation may not be that big a problem.

Targeting The Pakistani Textile Industry

Pakistan’s goods exports in the last financial year were $23 billion, of which $13 billion or 58 per cent of the total came just from the textiles industry. This industry is not just export-intensive; it also creates bulk jobs—a low-cost manufacturing leverage, which even India has been trying to tap into.

Of the textile exports from Pakistan, 97 per cent are from the basic cotton textile area. The country hasn’t upgraded itself in a big way in synthetic or woollen textiles businesses. India is already focusing on developing textiles as a key growth sector for our own economy.

With flexible labour laws, tax holidays, social security subsidies and a general exports thrust, India can easily weaponise its own textiles capability to target Pakistani exports. Our textile exports are already in the $35 billion range annually. Specific targeting of large buyers of Pakistani exports and taking away just 25-30 per cent of Pakistani exports can destabilise Pakistan’s biggest foreign exchange earning sourcing. On the contrary, this value will be under 10 per cent of India’s textile exports, so creating additional capacity rapidly it not going to be a challenge.

Technology Play In Saudi Arabia and the UAE

Nearly 45 per cent of its robust $22 billion remittances—currently the most important reason why Pakistani economy hasn’t collapsed—comes from Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Unlike other Asian nationalities, where there is a continuum of workforce skills, Pakistanis are more likely to be engaged in lower-end manual labour more often than not. Driving and construction are two such occupations.

Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE tend to be behind the curve when it comes to using enterprise technology. India can specifically invest in industrial scale technologies and export such expertise, which can substitute labour deployment in these countries. Areas like self-driving vehicles, autonomous industrial equipment and use of drones can easily offset labour use in the heavy industries like of which are abundant in the Middle East.

Cannibalizing lower end manual jobs will most significantly hit Pakistani workforce. With the government of Pakistan in no position to invest in short-term skills upgrade or long-term education revamp, this action can precipitate a remittance crisis.

Targeting The Military-Industrial Complex

The Pakistani military is not just a fighting force but also a trading giant, much like the British East India Company. The military runs several businesses related and unrelated to defence and has over time come to become a parallel centre of economic activity in itself. As per a report presented in the Pakistani Senate in 2016, there were more than fifty commercial entities owned by the military, which were collectively worth $20 billion in value. In fact, some independent commentators estimate the army’s total stake in private businesses to be over $100 billion (around 40 per cent of Pakistan’s FY 2019 GDP).

From brands like Fauji Fertilizers to banking entities like the Askari Bank, from real estate business by the Defence Housing Authority to cement factories, the military runs a budget which is outside the Pakistani federal budget. The military has also got involved in seemingly utilitarian consumer businesses like running petrol pumps, bakeries and dairies. The Fauji brand is all pervasive in the economy.

India can identify key products of the Fauji Foundation, against which Indian exports can be dumped in major overseas markets of Pakistan. India can today afford to remain irrational longer than Pakistan can afford to remain solvent. Such export dumping can be easily subsidised by the Indian government until it makes an impact. Making a dent in the Pakistani military-industrial complex will severely impact the power armed forces enjoy in the country.

Invest In Global Lobbying

One area where India has traditionally lagged far behind Pakistan is leveraging the power of global lobbying. This is of significance given that Pakistan budgets 28 per cent of its gross federal resources for FY 2020 to come from external sources in the forms of loans and grants. Additionally, over $50 billion of its external debt outstanding in FY 2019 was through the Paris Club and various multilateral and bilateral arrangements.

From engaging the thinktanks on the Beltway to contributing to an ignoble December 2019 election defeat of the gullible British Labour Party over the Kashmir issue, the Pakistani propaganda machinery internationally is far more productive and effective. In July 2019, Pakistan revealed that it had hired Holland and Knight, a leading lobbying firm, to further its interests in the United States.

Even otherwise, entities like the Fai network, run by the Kashmiri moghul Syed Ghulam Nabi Fai, have been instrumental in the past in manipulating Indian opinion makers at scale. India, on the other hand, has no truck with the Pakistani intelligentsia, opinion makers or artists and this equation is not likely to change.

While India has just started to leverage its diaspora, there is a long way to go. There has to be a systematic investment in putting across Indian point of view. With conservative and nationalist politics currently in favour in many key countries, there is no better time to create international pressure on Pakistan and develop goodwill for India. We already have the right stories of past sufferings and the future potential to tell—investments are needed in packaging and in cultivating allies.

The domino impact of targeting exports, external borrowing rates and external relations will be huge. Taken together, it will cause PKR to weaken, which does impact Pakistan’s external debt servicing ability. It will also cause the Pakistan central bank to keep increasing rates which will in turn cause capital to become expensive locally, causing further structural problems due to scant capital investment. Pakistan has received a lot of inflow in its domestic debt issues because of the carry, i.e. borrow outside at low rates and then invest in Pakistan for 11 per cent. But this works only till the investor feels that the currency will not depreciate by 10 per cent. It can all unravel pretty soon if currency weakens.

India has all the reasons as well as the right capabilities to create its own version of exploding mangoes on the western front. A little imagination and investment from the government can go a long way.

(Aashish Chandorkar is a public policy analyst based in Pune. Anirudh Limaye is an investment management professional. Views expressed in this article are personal.)

‘Deep Anti-China Sentiment Among Young People’

YouTube Video

NEW DELHI: China’s tactics in dealing with the protests in Hong Kong appears to be working. It has given the demonstrators long rope, allowing for time and fatigue to take its toll on them.  Prof Daya Thussu of Hong Kong’s Baptist University, believes the worst maybe over for Hong Kong. In an exclusive chat with StratNewsGlobal’s Editor Surya Gangadharan, he says the suspicion that some of the protests may have been triggered from outside is not without merit, but locals are also fed up with the influx of Chinese mainlanders into their city state, and the soaring cost of living that has made decent housing un-affordable for many.


‘Maldives Has Moved From Denial To Dealing With Religious Extremism’

YouTube Video
NEW DELHI: Faris Maumoon, Executive Council Member of the Maldives Reform Movement (MRM) in conversation with StratNewsGlobal Associate Editor Amitabh P. Revi. The discussion ranges from how and why the MRM headed by former President Maumoon Gayoom split with ex-President Yameen, how India is back as the primary strategic partner, what is China’s role in trade and development and how religious extremism is being handled in a country that was once reported to supply the most fundamentalists per capita to the ‘Islamic State’ and other terror groups
Maumoon Gayoom was the President of Maldives from 1978-2008. His half-brother Abdulla Yameen Abdul Gayoom won the 2013 Presidential polls which saw a distinct shift in policy away from New Delhi towards Beijing. The brothers though split in 2016 and ex-President Gayoom and family members, including his son Faris Maumoon, were jailed but subsequently released. Now, ex-President Yameen is in jail, ex-President Gayoom is with the current government headed by President Ibrahim Solih.

When Doval Met Gotabaya

India and Sri Lanka hope to further bolster cooperation in the area of national security among other things. India’s National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval and Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa flagged it as a priority area during their meeting in Colombo on Saturday.

“Strengthening of bilateral cooperation on national security, intelligence sharing, maritime security & fostering of regional collaboration, were some of the key points of discussion,” tweeted Gotabaya. Sources in New Delhi told StratNews Global that counter-terrorism, intelligence cooperation and economic development in the Indo-Pacific region were also discussed.

The brisk Indian outreach to the Sri Lankan government began soon after the election victory of Gotabaya, who was defence secretary under the presidency of his elder brother Mahinda Rajapaksa. The NSA, StratNews Global learns, also spoke to Mahinda, who is now Sri Lankan PM, over the phone. A face-to-face meeting couldn’t happen as the older Rajapaksa was not in Colombo.

Russian President Vladimir Putin Won’t Just Go Into The Siberian Sunset In 2024

YouTube Video

NEW DELHI: Russian President Vladimir Putin’s was at his quintessential best in announcing surprise plans to make sweeping constitutional reform. Russia specialist Nandan Unnikrishnan discusses the Russian leader’s motives and whether he looks at himself as a ‘leader for life’ with StratNews Global Associate Editor Amitabh P. Revi. In a comprehensive review of India-Russia relations, the interview looks at President Putin’s options, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s bilateral visit to India and his speech at the ‘Raisina Dialogue’, reviews the India-Russia summit in Vladivostok and its outcomes, defence deals, the S-400 air defence system and how India deals with potential U.S. sanctions, energy cooperation and training of India’s Gaganyaan cosmonauts.

Nandan Unnikrishnan is a Distinguished Fellow at Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi.  He looks after the Eurasia Programme of Studies. An alumnus of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), he began his career as a journalist with the Press Trust of India (PTI). After 15 years in PTI culminating with a three-year posting to Moscow as the Bureau Chief, he moved to Business India’s Television Channel TVI. He joined TVI as the News Coordinator for International Affairs, rising to head the channel by 1998.  He specialises in Russia, Central Asia and other former Soviet territories.


How Will India’s Joint Commands Shape Up?

YouTube Video

NEW DELHI: One of the major tasks that the newly created Department of Military Affairs and India’s first Chief of Defence Staff have over the next few years is to create Joint Commands to increase combat efficiency. How will it be done? Our Editor-in-Chief explains in the first episode of his new show ‘Simply Nitin’.


Mission Lanka On Fast Track

Engagement at the highest levels between India and Sri Lanka which began soon after the Gotabaya Rajapaksa-led government took charge in November last year will get a leg-up with National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval visiting Colombo on Saturday. It is a measure of the importance New Delhi attaches to its ties with the strategically located Indian Ocean island nation that the NSA is in Colombo barely two months after Gotabaya was elected President. The two men are expected to exchange views over lunch and security is on their agenda, a little bird tells us. Not surprising given that ensuring national security has been promised by the new Sri Lankan President as his country still struggles to come to terms with the Easter Sunday terror strikes of last year.

India is keen on ensuring it maintains close and robust ties with the new government to keep Chinese influence at bay in Sri Lanka. New Delhi got off to a swift start with the new government in Sri Lanka when External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar flew down to Colombo within days of Gotabaya’s win in mid-November. This was followed by a visit by Gotabaya himself to India in late November. Early this month, the Sri Lankan foreign minister Dinesh Gunawardena was in New Delhi. And Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaka who is also a former President of Sri Lanka and Gotabaya’s older brother is expected to be in New Delhi next month.

But even as the visits continue apace, New Delhi cannot afford to let down its guard as far Chinese efforts to increase its sphere of influence in Sri Lanka are concerned. Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi was in the island nation a few days ago and President Gotabaya will be headed to China next month. The Asian giants, clearly, are on a charm offensive in a nation that also straddles important sea lanes.

Eye On Access To Indian Ocean, Xi Jinping Visits Myanmar

NEW DELHI: India is closely monitoring Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to Myanmar. It’s his first overseas visit in the new year, usually an indication or warning of strategic import. That was the case in 2017 when Xi was at the World Economic Forum in Davos and in 2018 when he flew into Tehran shortly after sanctions had been lifted. Today, China is seen as Iran’s staunchest ally against the United States.

So is President Xi working towards the same goal? According to Myanmar’s widely respected online magazine Irrawaddy, Xi, the first Chinese President to visit Myanmar in 19 years, has come bearing many gifts: A $1.3 billion deep-sea port in Rakhine state on the Bay of Bengal which will give Beijing access to the Indian Ocean; alongside the port will be a special economic zone where garment and food processing factories will employ thousands of Myanmarese workers (or so the Chinese claim); the Chinese have also promised $1.7 billion to fund a new city opposite the former capital Yangon.

This is heady stuff. The Chinese have also promised to build a high speed rail link between China’s neighbouring province of Yunnan and the former Myanmar capital of Mandalay. There are some doubts on that score since the line will have to pass through areas controlled by various armed militias who rely on the drug trade and can be expected to cooperate only if their interests are protected.

There is no word on whether Myanmar will give the go ahead to the controversial China-funded Myitsone Dam, work on which was stopped some years ago after the local population protested over its environmental impact.

India is funding its own projects in Myanmar but cannot match the estimated $20 billion China has invested. According to the Irrawaddy, Myanmar will be careful to ensure it is not caught in a Chinese debt trap, but the country is isolated since it forcefully expelled thousands of Muslims from Rakhine state some years ago.

India has walked a careful path, counselling Myanmar’s leaders to take back its own people, while contributing to building infrastructure in Rakhine, including homes for the local people.

India To Invite Pak For SCO Summit, Will Imran Attend?

NEW DELHI: Will he, won’t he? That’s the big question after India on Thursday said Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan will be invited for the summit of heads of government of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) in New Delhi, later this year.

Raveesh Kumar, Spokesman of the Ministry of External Affairs, said: “As per established practice and procedure in SCO, all eight members of the SCO as well as four observer states and other international dialogue partners will be invited to attend the meeting.” The eight members are Russia, China, India, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Pakistan.

Given the current state of bilateral relations, the Pakistani Prime Minister may not come or he may send Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi. But there is also a view that Imran Khan may see this as an opportunity to blow some steam on Indian soil. Pakistan is angry over India revoking Kashmir’s special status and reducing it to two Union Territories—Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. The two sides have regularly traded barbs and Islamabad has sought to internationalise the issue even as New Delhi has maintained that the state’s bifurcation is its internal matter.

The latest such attempt by Pakistan was made through China, which sought a discussion on Kashmir in the UN Security Council. The move, however, fell through. “An effort was made by Pakistan through a member of the UNSC to once again misuse the platform of UNSC for discussing a bilateral matter,” said Raveesh Kumar.

The move was rejected with overwhelming majority, indicating it was a bilateral matter. The U.S., UK, France, Russia and Germany backed India, saying that the UNSC wasn’t the forum for discussing Kashmir. UK’s support marked a shift from its ambivalent position at the UNSC last August when China had sought a discussion on Kashmir.

Kumar noted: “It once again highlighted Pakistan’s desperate measures to peddle baseless allegations and present an alarming scenario lacking any credibility.”

He described Pakistan’s effort to raise Jammu and Kashmir at the UN Security Council through China as a “misuse of UNSC” and Pakistan “has a choice to avoid this global embarrassment by refraining from such acts in future”.

There was a message for China as well. “China should seriously reflect on this global consensus, draw proper lessons and refrain from taking such action in future,” said Kumar.

The US, UK, France, Russia and Germany backed India saying that the UNSC wasn’t the forum for discussing Kashmir.

Indeed, the UK support was noteworthy as it marked a significant shift from its previous position at the UNSC last August when China had sought a discussion on Kashmir. The UK had then adopted an ambivalent stand.

EU Sees India Relationship As Key To Its Future

NEW DELHI: Europe seems to be at a crossroads today. The US pivot towards Asia has ensured that global geo-politics is slowly but surely being played towards the east of the world.

This trend, exacerbated by growing tensions within the transatlantic alliance, and the fact that the 28-member organisation cannot seem to pull together on crucial issues – be it relations with Russia, China and trade and security concerns – has led to uncertainty about Europe’s future.

Speaking at the Raisina Dialogue on the ‘Future of Europe’, Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto concurred with the view that the EU had lost a lot of power and leverage over the last few years.

“Major crises have happened over the last few years, but we can hardly name one where the EU has played an important role. The one exception was that of the JCPOA which now sadly looks more and more unlikely to be implemented,” he regretted.

Other speakers concurred arguing that the EU needed to figure what role it saw for itself in the ‘Great-Power’ era. Theresa Fallon, Director, Center for Russia Europe Asia Studies in Ireland said, “Europe has lost its balance and it needs to decide on how it will perform with regard to major crises in the world today. The problem is it has to decide on these crises quickly.

“Trade is a huge issue for Europe,” she pointed out saying that “it has to figure out what does the US-China trade talks meant for them. 5G is another issue with many European countries. On a security level, China’s investment around the region, especially in the ports in the Mediterranean, and its growing interest in the Arctic brings these challenges even closer home to Europe.”

The China question and talks of a possible ‘Reset with Russia’ has raised a huge debate within the continent. Currently Germany and France are in favour of pushing the EU towards the Russian orbit, which many east European and Baltic countries such as Estonia, find uncomfortable. On the question of China, the investments made by Beijing in East Europe, especially Hungary, has meant that the EU has been speaking in different voices so far on the question of Huawei, BRI and 5G.

Hans-Thomas Paulsen, member of the executive board of the Korber-Stiftung foundation in Germany, believed that the different voices were arising because of a lack of strong leadership.

“Germany and France together need to lead Europe, but they are not on the same page. For Germany, the priority is to keep the club together, the French vision is more of a core Europe that works more closely together. So, this paradox continues about Europe and weakens it.”

Apart from differing voices, security continues to be a prime concern for the continent. President Trump’s insistence that the EU pay its share for security in the continent may not have gone down well, but EU members have realised that if Europe wants to put itself back on the world map, strategic autonomy was the key.

As Paulsen pointed out, “Europe has a long way to go to ensure its strategic autonomy in terms of security. After Brexit, 80 per cent of defence spending for NATO is done by non-EU members so we do need to look at that urgently.”

Asked as to what they saw as the continent’s future, most of the panelists agreed that the EU’s future lay with building up relations with countries like India. “Post Brexit, the EU should look for stronger trade relations with India. There is a need to revive talks about an FTA which last ended in 2013,” Fallon said.

Marina Kaljurand, Member of the European Parliament for Estonia, echoed these sentiments adding, “External Affairs Minister Jaishankar had said that India is under-performing. Minister, it takes two to tango. We too have been under-performing from our side and we will do better in the next five years.”

Amazon’s Proposed Billion Dollar Investment No Great Favour To India: Commerce Minister

NEW DELHI: The world’s richest man and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has been on a charm offensive during his three-day India visit—from donning a kurta pyjama and paying obeisance at Gandhi’s samadhi in Rajghat (like any head of state) to flying kites (literally) with children. He also promised to invest a billion dollars in India over the next five years to enable small and medium businesses to come online.

But his charm endeavour cut no ice with the Indian government. Responding to a question at the Raisina Dialogue, in the packed Durbar Hall of Delhi’s Taj Palace Hotel, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said Bezos wasn’t doing India any favour by announcing the billion dollar investment.

“They may have put in a billion dollars but then if they make a loss of a billion dollars every year, they will have to finance the billion dollars. So it’s not as if they’re doing a great favour to India when they invest a billion.”

Goyal also said that “predatory pricing or some unfair trade practice” is among the issues that need to be addressed, underscoring that the Competition Commission of India was investigating Amazon’s work practices. In fact, Bezos is here to do some fire-fighting for his company amid charges that his losses are the result of deep discounts being offered, and that small sellers are being discriminated against.

Goyal noted that e-commerce entities were allowed into India under the “marketplace model, which is an agnostic platform where buyers and sellers are free to trade and transaction is between the seller and the buyer.”

This means the marketplace cannot own the inventory, nor control the inventory or even determine prices. Going further, he said “it cannot have algorithms to determine which product will be in the pre-eminent position or would be given a market preference offered to the buyers.”

While India welcomes e-commerce, it has very strict rules about FDI in multi-brand retail with a limit of 49 per cent, said the minister. “But anybody who tries to use the e-commerce marketplace model to get into the multi-brand retail space surreptitiously will have to be questioned and investigated,” he warned.

Reminding investors to “follow the letter of the law and the spirit of the law” Goyal said, “don’t try to find loopholes within the defined letter of the law when the marketplace model is clearly demarcated.”

Chinese Ships Have Entered Our Exclusive Economic Zones In IOR, Says India’s Naval Chief

NEW DELHI: Concerns about China, and China’s increased naval presence was uppermost in the mind of India’s Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Karambir Singh. Speaking at the Raisina Dialogue, he acknowledged that China’s heightened activity in the Indian Ocean was something that New Delhi was keeping a close eye on.

 “The PLA Navy, which is the strategic arm of the PLA, has grown at a rapid pace in the region. When they first came in 2008 for anti-piracy patrol in the Indian Ocean region, they weren’t really very obvious in the IOR. But today you will find at any given time seven, eight PLA warships in the area, research vessels and a large fishing fleet, ” he said.

 “We have to admit it, Djibouti is a reality, Gwadar is on and I’m sure there are more places to come. If you see their defence exports, nearly 85 per cent of China’s defence exports are in the Indian Ocean region, ” the admiral warned.

Asked how India was responding, he said, “We are watching and observing what is happening. We have placed ships in mission-based deployments so we can get an idea of what are their activities. This is not only for China we do want to keep an eye on what all other countries are doing. So, if there is anything that impinges on our national sovereignty we’ll have to act.”

 “In my mind, if there is any maritime activity that deviates from the norm or rule-based order that can cause regional instability,” he said.

His counterpart in Japan’s Self-Defence Force echoed similar concerns.  “We are closely watching China to ensure that peace and stability in the region is maintained,” Gen Koji Yamazaki said, pointing  out that,  “As you already know their military expansion is quite extensive especially in the East and South China Sea.  The Japan-US alliance is particularly important in this regard and we are constantly having naval exercises to ensure peace and stability in the region.”

The brass of other navies preferred to take a more diplomatic approach with respect to China. Asked about the Quad and whether it was being set up as a force to counter China, Vice Admiral David Johnston of the Royal Australian Navy said, “The Quad is a relationship between democracies with shared interests. It isn’t reflective of anti-anything in particular. We have bilateral and multilateral mechanisms and Quad is another one of them.”

However, Admiral Karambir Singh underscored India’s concerns.  “There have been instances when PLA ships have come into our exclusive economic zones and we have had to tell them that such acts impinge on our areas. And if you see the BRI, CPEC it does impinge on our sovereignty. In the instance of the EEZ, we have acted, we told them to move, they respected our request and moved out. But our concerns remain.”

430 Indian Cities Saw Protests Over Soleimani Killing, Claims Iran Foreign Minister

NEW DELHI: It was a monologue rather than the conversation it was billed to be. But Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif didn’t disappoint the packed hall at the Raisina Dialogue in Delhi, alternating between contrition for the downing of the Ukrainian passenger aircraft by his military and lashing out at the U.S. for killing Quds Force chief General Qasim Soleimani.

The audience of top diplomats, strategic analysts and the media from India and abroad was Zarif’s first outside his country since Soleimani’s killing and he made full use of the platform. So much so that he claimed there were demonstrations/meetings in 430 Indian cities over the top Iranian General’s killing. Soleimani’s killing was a setback to the campaign against the Da’esh (ISIS), he warned and asked, “Who is celebrating Soleimani’s killing? President Trump, Pompeo and Da’esh. You wonder about strange bedfellows?”

He pinned the blame on the U.S. for Iran downing the aircraft. “The accidental shooting happened because there was a crisis. People made unforgivable mistakes. We have to ensure these crises are prevented,” he said. “Two things are very dangerous which when combined become even more dangerous—ignorance and arrogance. When you become an arrogant ignorant or an ignorant arrogant, it becomes a disaster particularly when you have a lot of power.”

Zarif was particularly critical of Europe, given that the UK, Germany and France had set in motion the dispute mechanism process while accusing Iran of breaching the 2015 nuclear agreement. “The future of the nuclear deal depends on Europe. JCPOA was one of the best deals… one of the best multilateral agreements. None of the 11 commitments given to Iran was fulfilled. Not only U.S. but also EU failed to keep those commitments,” he regretted, pointing out that “You (EU countries) are independent countries. Why do you let the U.S. bully you?”

He sounded a clear warning: “We have said that once Europe reverses, we will reverse too. We have lost hundreds of billions of dollars. If they pay us those hundreds of billions we will reverse our decisions.”

Zarif raised some eyebrows when he claimed that Soleimani’s killing provoked widespread sympathy in India. “I was surprised to hear that in 430 Indian cities there were spontaneous demonstrations and meetings to commemorate General Soleimani. The U.S. talks about proxies. Do we have proxies in India?”

He repeated this claim more than once his speech, going so far as to say that 8000 people in Delhi and 9000 in Mumbai gathered in public to mourn Soleimani.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif met India’s National Security Adviser Ajit Doval in New Delhi on Wednesday. (Photo: @IrnaEnglish)

During his day’s engagements, the Iranian leader called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the National Security Adviser Ajit Doval. All bilateral issues were discussed including trade, energy, economic cooperation and the development of the strategic Chabahar port in Iran. Gulf tensions also figured in the exchanges with both Indian leaders.

India More Comfortable With Wielding Influence Than Power: Jaishankar

NEW DELHI: It is not in India to be a disruptor in the international system, said External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar. Speaking at the fifth edition of the annual Raisina Dialogue, he described India as a stabilizing power, one that is law-abiding, not self-centred or selfish.

“India seeks to be a shaper and not an abstainer in the international system,” he said. “So whether it is about climate change or connectivity, we have made a difference. We also see ourselves as a standard bearer of the South.”

In the last five years, India has undertaken 142 connectivity projects, 52 of which have been completed. India has rebuilt the Sri Lankan railway network; Nepal has benefited through power projects and New Delhi has poured money into roads, power projects and schemes to help people in Afghanistan. That is only in the neighbourhood.

“I am off to Niger where I will inaugurate a convention centre we have helped build. There are other projects from Rwanda to Morocco.”

“India as a nation is more comfortable with wielding influence than in wielding power,” said Jaishankar, pointing out that India is sharing responsibilities as a net security provider. It has white shipping agreements with 16 countries, handed over naval vessels to eight Indian Ocean states, installed coastal surveillance radars in six countries, given $2 billion line of credit to 11 states, all in the last five years.

“The India-China relationship is unique,” said Jaishankar. “Rarely in history have two neighbours risen in the world at roughly the same time.” This presents its own problems and it is necessary, therefore, for the two countries to build accommodation and understanding, he said. The question is on what basis since both are dynamic states.

“In about a decade, perhaps more, India and China would be equal in economic terms and if you are ranked one, two or three in the world, it is necessary that you get on.”

He confessed to feeling “nostalgic” about Russia. “I am entitled to feeling nostalgic since I began my career there,” he said, “but in the last 50-60 years every major centre of power has seen major fluctuations. This is the case in India-U.S. ties, U.S.-China relations, U.S.-Russia relations, but if you plot the India-Russia relationship, it has deep roots in a geopolitical understanding, unspoken but it is there.”

In more recent times, relations with the U.S. have undergone a major transformation. “We are not under-delivering in the relationship,” he insisted, pointing to how the relationship has moved from purely G2G (Government to Government) to B2B, T2T (Technology to Technology) and also P2P (People to People). The U.S., Jaishankar believes, is moving beyond alliances and is entering the knowledge world where talent and innovation are critical. India could have a critical role to play here.

The European Union is India’s largest trading and financial partner but Delhi is dealing more on a bilateral basis with European states rather than with the collective EU. “I am looking to build the kind of convergence politically and strategically and hope to get it moving.”

He said the world would have seen “a big jump” in the India-Australia relationship if Prime Minister Scott Morrison had come. Both countries are planning major steps in counter-terrorism, maritime security, connectivity and in other areas.