Home Blog Page 23

Trump Backs French Far-Right Leader Le Pen Following Conviction

U.S. President Donald Trump expressed his support for French far-right leader Marine Le Pen on Thursday after a Paris court found her and several members of her National Rally (RN) party guilty of misusing European Union funds earlier this week.

A judge handed Le Pen an immediate five-year ban on running for office that will bar her from the 2027 presidential election unless she can get the ruling overturned on appeal beforehand.

The judge is now under police protection after facing death threats, a source told Reuters on Wednesday.

Le Pen, RN allies and her supporters accused the trial judges of interfering in democracy. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou told lawmakers on Tuesday that he “unconditionally supported” the judiciary.

Trump Calls It ‘Witch Hunt’

In a Truth Social post late on Thursday, Trump called the case against Le Pen a “Witch Hunt” while praising the far-right leader.

“She suffered losses, but kept on going, and now, just before what would be a Big Victory, they get her on a minor charge that she probably knew nothing about – Sounds like a ‘bookkeeping’ error to me,” Trump said in his post.

Rights advocates have drawn comparisons over the years between Le Pen and Trump over their anti-immigration views and charged rhetoric against minorities.

The French court’s ruling was a setback for Le Pen, 56. She was a front-runner in polls for France’s 2027 contest until her conviction. Trump compared Le Pen’s situation to his own.

Trump was indicted over covering up a hush money payment to a porn star, over attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election that he lost and over retention of classified documents after his first term ended. He was convicted in the hush money case. He denied wrongdoing in all cases that he called politically motivated.

Federal charges against him were dropped following his 2024 election win.

“It is all so bad for France,” Trump said in his post.

(With inputs from Reuters)

U.S. Senate Votes Against Halting Arms Sales To Israel

Senate
The U.S. Capitol building is seen in Washington, U.S., December 18, 2023. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

The U.S. Senate on Thursday strongly opposed an attempt to stop $8.8 billion in arms sales to Israel. The move came amid concerns over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza following Israel’s airstrikes and restrictions on aid deliveries.

The Senate voted 82-15 and 83-15 to reject two resolutions of disapproval over sales of massive bombs and other offensive military equipment. The resolutions were offered by Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, an independent who caucuses with Democrats.

In each case, Democratic Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin voted “present.”

A decades-long tradition of strong bipartisan support for Israel in the U.S. Congress means resolutions to stop weapons sales are unlikely to pass, but backers hope raising the issue will encourage Israel’s government and U.S. administrations to do more to protect civilians.

Sanders Describes Situation As ‘Unthinkable’

In remarks urging support for the resolutions, Sanders described the toll on civilians – with thousands of children facing malnutrition and starvation, especially from a recent blockade of humanitarian assistance.

“What is happening right now is unthinkable. Today it is 31 days and counting with absolutely no humanitarian aid getting into Gaza, nothing. No food, no water, no medicine, no fuel, for over a month,” Sanders said.

The suspension, which Israel says is aimed at pressuring militant group Hamas in ceasefire talks, applies to food, medicine and fuel imports.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman James Risch urged defeat of the Sanders resolutions, saying, “They would abandon Israel, our closest ally in the Middle East, during a pivotal moment for global security.”

More than 50,000 Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli campaign in Gaza, Palestinian officials say. It was launched after thousands of Hamas-led gunmen attacked southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and abducting 251 as hostages, according to Israeli tallies.

Much of Gaza has been reduced to rubble, leaving hundreds of thousands of people sheltering in tents or bombed-out buildings.

Thursday’s vote took place the same day that hundreds of thousands of Gazans fled in search of shelter in one of the biggest mass displacements of the war. Israeli forces are advancing into the ruins of the city of Rafah, part of a newly announced “security zone” they intend to seize.

Previous Resolutions Have Failed

The Senate voted overwhelmingly in November to block three resolutions introduced by Sanders that would have halted transfers of weapons approved by the administration of then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat whom some progressives criticized as doing too little to help Palestinians as conditions in Gaza worsened.

President Donald Trump, who began a second term on January 20 and is a fierce advocate for Israel, has reversed Biden’s efforts to place some limits on what arms are sent to Netanyahu’s government. He has also floated the idea of transferring Palestinians out of Gaza and turning the enclave into “the Riviera of the Middle East.”

Trump earlier this year sidestepped the congressional review process to approve billions of dollars in military sales to Israel.

U.S. law gives Congress the right to review major foreign weapons sales and block them by passing resolutions of disapproval. Although no such resolution has both passed Congress and survived a presidential veto, the law requires the Senate to vote if a resolution is filed. Such resolutions have at times led to angry debates embarrassing to past presidents.

(With inputs from Reuters)

France: Toulon Voters Question Le Pen’s Tactics Amid Legal Setback

Yvon Castel, a long-time supporter of the far-right National Rally, says he is unimpressed by Marine Le Pen’s tactics to overturn a legal ruling that blocked her from the 2027 elections. “She’s not above the law,” the 72-year-old remarked, a sentiment shared by others in Toulon, a sun-drenched port city with a strong far-right following.

A Paris court convicted Le Pen and two dozen National Rally (RN) party members of embezzling EU funds on Monday. It imposed an immediate five-year ban on Le Pen running for office that will prevent her from standing in 2027 unless she can get the ruling overturned next summer.

Le Pen has called for a peaceful mass protest in Paris on Sunday, which will give an indication of how much popular support there is for her claims of a democratic crisis.

But her and her allies’ attacks against the “tyranny of judges” have played badly, particularly after the lead judge who convicted her had to get police protection following death threats. President Emmanuel Macron called those threats “unbearable and intolerable.”

Castel was also not pleased. “I don’t like the fact she’s attacking judges,” he said, underlining the challenges Le Pen faces winning over supporters who, for all their backing for her disruptive party, are not against the courts.

‘Not Shocked’

Polls show a majority of French people don’t see any problem with the court’s decision. Some 65% of respondents said they were “not shocked” by the verdict and 54% said Le Pen was treated like any other defendant, according to an Odoxa poll.

“The RN’s point doesn’t fly with the wider public opinion,” Odoxa’s Gael Sliman told Reuters. “They can’t go too far in attacking judges, especially if they want to broaden their appeal. Some of their voters are not anti-establishment.”

That was especially the case among older voters, a segment of the population the RN is courting to win power in 2027.

“You can’t steal 4 million euros like that from people. The verdict was fair,” Francoise Bellis, a 77-year old pensioner, said. She laughed when she heard Russia saying the verdict had “killed democracy” in France.

“That’s really the pot calling the kettle black,” she added.

Former RN Stronghold

Toulon, one of France’s historic naval bases, plays a central role in the RN’s history. The city was governed by what was then known as the National Front in the late 1990s, one of the first major mayorships the once-fringe party won.

The experience left a bitter taste for some voters after former far-right mayor, Jean-Marie Le Chevallier, was found guilty of corruption and left the city’s coffers empty.

After years of trying to professionalize the party and clean up its image, Le Pen had been hoping to reconquer Toulon. Laure Lavalette, a Le Pen lieutenant who represents a Toulon voting district in the National Assembly, has yet to announce her candidacy, but is widely expected to run for mayor in 2026.

Lavalette did not return a request for comment. Her rivals said Le Pen’s conviction would dredge up bad memories of RN wrongdoing for many in Toulon.

“The people in Toulon are going to think twice before giving their vote to the RN now,” said Eddie Goujit, a young entrepreneur who has launched a long-shot bid for mayor. “I think Laure Lavalette had strong chances, but the court’s decision is going to hurt a lot.”

The Bardella Alternative

Another factor undermining the RN’s anti-judicial strategy in Toulon is the fact that former Mayor Hubert Falco – a Macron supporter who was convicted of graft in 2023 – received the same public office ban as Le Pen. Falco’s lawyers did not return a request for comment.

Le Pen’s ban has opened her up to competition from within her ranks. Her 29-year old protege, party president Jordan Bardella, is wildly popular among the RN’s younger, working class voters and must now walk a tightrope between his political ambitions and loyalty to his boss.

Constance Pellegrini, a 30-year-old security agent and longtime RN supporter, said Le Pen was clearly “being squashed to prevent her from becoming president”.

But she said a generational handover was no bad thing: “The political world is scared of her. But fingers crossed the young Bardella will replace her.”

(With inputs from Reuters)

South Korea’s President Yoon Removed After Court Upholds Impeachment

South Korea’s Constitutional Court confirmed on Friday that President Yoon Suk Yeol is officially removed from office. The decision comes after he was impeached for trying to bring in martial law last year, which led to a major political crisis in the country.

The unanimous ruling caps months of political turmoil that have overshadowed efforts to deal with the new administration of U.S. President Donald Trump at a time of slowing growth in Asia’s fourth-largest economy.

A presidential election is now required to take place within 60 days, according to the constitution, with Prime Minister Han Duck-soo to continue serving as acting president until the new president is inaugurated.

“The Constitutional Court’s unanimous ruling has removed a major source of uncertainty,” said Professor Leif-Eric Easley of Ewha University in Seoul. “And not a moment too soon, given how the next administration in Seoul must navigate North Korea’s military threats, China’s diplomatic pressure, and Trump’s trade tariffs.”

Acting Chief Justice Moon Hyung-bae said Yoon violated his duty as president with his December 3 martial law declaration, acting beyond his constitutional powers with actions that were “a serious challenge to democracy”.

“(Yoon) committed a grave betrayal of the people’s trust who are the sovereign members of the democratic republic,” Moon said, adding that Yoon’s declaration of martial law created chaos in all areas of society, the economy and foreign policy.

People Celebrate The Decision

Thousands of people at a rally calling for Yoon’s ouster, including hundreds who had camped out overnight, erupted into wild cheers on hearing the ruling, chanting “We won!”

“This took a long time but it’s fortunate that it is a sensible outcome,” said Kim Han-sol, a 23-year-old student at a rally who watched the ruling outside the court.

Supporters of Yoon who were gathered near his official residence watched the ruling on a big screen in stunned silence. Some reacted in anger, with one protester arrested for smashing a police bus window, the Yonhap news agency reported. Others held their heads in hands and wept.

The South Korean won was largely unfazed by Friday’s ruling, remaining at about 1% higher versus the dollar at 1,436.6 per dollar. The benchmark KOSPI was down 0.7%, also unchanged from the morning as the expected scenario was for the court to uphold the impeachment bill.

Arguments Rejected

The court rejected most of Yoon’s argument that he declared martial law to sound the alarm over the main opposition party’s abuse of its parliamentary majority, saying there were legal avenues to address disagreements.

The martial law decree lacked justification and was also procedurally defective, Moon said. Mobilising the military against parliament to disrupt its functions was a grave violation of Yoon’s constitutional duty to safeguard the independence of the three branches of government, he added.

The presidential flag that flew alongside the national flag at the presidential office was lowered on Friday after the ruling. At military bases and command centres around the country, portraits of Yoon will be taken down to be shredded or burned, according to law.

One of Yoon’s lawyers, Yoon Kab-keun, said it was a legally implausible decision by a court that conducted the trial in questionable manners.

“This can only be seen as a political decision and it’s really disappointing,” he told reporters. Yoon has not emerged from his official residence, where he has been holed up since his release from jail on March 8.

Kwon Young-se, the interim leader of Yoon’s ruling People Power Party, apologised to the people saying the party humbly accepted the court’s ruling and pledged to work with the acting president to stabilise the country.

Acting President Han Duck-soo, speaking after the ruling, said he would do all he could to ensure an orderly and peaceful presidential election.

Finance Minister Choi Sang-mok is expected to convene an emergency meeting with the Bank of Korea governor and financial regulators.

Financial Priorities

Shoring up growth and formulating a response to a 25% tariff imposed by the United States on South Korean imports are urgent priorities for the government.

The finance ministry has proposed a 10 trillion won ($7 billion) supplementary budget but needs to seek a compromise with the opposition Democratic Party whose leader Lee Jae-myung, the top liberal presidential contender, is targeting 30 trillion won.

The 64-year-old Yoon still faces a criminal trial on insurrection charges related to the martial law declaration which carries a maximum sentence of death or life imprisonment. The embattled leader became the first sitting South Korean president to be arrested on January 15 but was released in March after a court cancelled his arrest warrant. Oral arguments in the case starts on April 14.

The crisis was triggered by Yoon’s surprise late night declaration that martial law was needed to root out “anti-state” elements and to stop the alleged abuse of its parliamentary majority by the opposition Democratic Party.

Yoon lifted the decree six hours later after parliamentary staffers used barricades and fire extinguishers to ward off special operations soldiers who arrived by helicopter and broke windows as they sought to enter parliament, where lawmakers voted to reject martial law.

Yoon has said he never intended to fully impose emergency military rule and tried to downplay the fallout, saying nobody was hurt.

($1 = 1,434.8500 won)

(With inputs from Reuters)

Deadly Spring Storm Kills 7, Spurs Tornadoes Across U.S.

A powerful spring storm claimed the lives of at least seven people and triggered tornadoes and heavy thunderstorms across a region stretching from Texas to Ohio on Thursday. The severe weather continued for a second day, increasing the threat of flooding.

The powerful system is expected to stall over the country’s midsection, the National Weather Service said, fueling further deluges and possible tornadoes in areas already drenched with heavy rain.

“We’re concerned there could be some strong but essentially intense tornadoes across Northeast Texas up into Western Arkansas,” said Evan Bentley, a forecaster at the NWS’ Storm Prediction Center.

Storm Upgraded

The NWS upgraded the storms to a risk level four out of five on a scale used to measure the expected intensity of severe weather. Only 10 to 12 storms are given a four rating per year, making them “pretty rare,” Bentley said.

The extreme weather has killed at least seven people since Wednesday, according to media reports. The fatalities include a father and his 16-year-old daughter who were killed when a tornado hit their modular home in Tennessee, according to the New York Times.

Five people in total died in Tennessee in weather-related incidents, one in Indiana and one in Missouri, NBC News reported. At least 13 were injured across the region.

About 34 tornadoes were reported across the region on Wednesday, according to the Storm Prediction Center. It confirmed that at least one tornado touched down in Wilmington, Ohio, about 50 miles (80 km) northeast of Cincinnati.

Twisters were confirmed overnight in six states: Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.

Catastrophic And Life-Threatening

Climate change is bringing heavier rainfall and related flood risks in most parts of the U.S., with the upper Midwest and Ohio River Valley among the regions most affected, according to Climate Central, an independent nonprofit that researches weather patterns.

In July 2023, for example, days of historic flash flooding spread across western Kentucky into portions of southern Illinois after six to 12 inches (152 to 305 mm) of rain fell, mostly within 10 hours, the NWS said.

On Thursday, the risk of rainfall topping flash-flood guidance was at 40% or higher for an area stretching from western Arkansas northeast to southwestern Ohio, according to NWS maps.

Flash-flood warnings are in effect in the Ohio River Valley from the northwestern corner of Mississippi to northeastern Kentucky.

“Any flash and riverine flooding across these areas will have the potential to become catastrophic and life-threatening,” the NWS Weather Prediction Center said on social media.

Layoffs

The NWS is part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The wave of severe weather is one of the first since the Trump administration began to sharply cut NOAA’s workforce, part of an initiative by the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency, led by billionaire Elon Musk, to slash the size of the federal payroll. The weather service is housed within the NOAA.

The layoffs and a buyout program are expected to shrink NOAA’s headcount by roughly 20% and could hamper some of its operations, scientists and researchers have said.

Despite those concerns, there were no apparent delays or disruption in the weather service’s forecasts for the areas affected by this week’s storm system.

(With inputs from Reuters)

South Korea: Yoon’s Recklessness and Personal Scandals Lead To Downfall

South Korea’s ousted leader, Yoon Suk Yeol, a bold ex-prosecutor known for defying setbacks and taking risks, ultimately fell due to political recklessness that led to his decision to impose martial law, according to former colleagues.

Dogged by personal scandals involving his wife, a bitter row with political opponents whom he called communist sympathisers, and party-room rifts, Yoon was removed from the presidency on Friday in the third year of his five-year term.

The Constitutional Court upheld Yoon’s impeachment by parliament, ruling unanimously that he violated his constitutional duty by briefly declaring martial law on December 3 with no justifiable grounds.

Yoon, 64, still faces a criminal trial on charges of masterminding insurrection when he mobilised troops to try to shut down an opposition-led parliament that he accused of trying to destroy the country.

He denies wrongdoing, arguing in court that his six-hour attempt at martial law was to protect the country from “anti-state forces.”

‘Would Have Staged A Coup’

Yoon used his legal career as a launchpad for elected office, according to a former colleague, winning the presidency in 2022.

“Yoon Suk Yeol was the most powerful prosecutor-general ever,” said Han Dong-soo, a former judge who was head of internal inspection at the prosecutors’ office under Yoon. “He used the office to carry out his plan to become president and in doing so, his actions were daring.”

Han recalls the future president remarking at a dinner he hosted with free-flowing drinks in 2020: “If I had gone to the military academy, I would have staged a coup.”

Yoon led high-profile investigations of the politically powerful, billed as a crusade against corruption that launched him into the public eye and generated the support that led to his victory in the presidential election.

But once in the presidency, he struggled to emulate his courtroom victories. Instead, he became increasingly embittered by unrelenting battles with opponents that drew out a recklessness that a former prosecution rival said was his defining trait.

By the time Yoon briefly imposed martial law in December, he was badly bruised politically.

Scandals, ‘American Pie’

Yoon’s presidency was overshadowed by scandals involving his wife, Kim Keon Hee, who was accused of inappropriately accepting a Christian Dior handbag as a gift.

Yoon apologised after his conservative party suffered a crushing parliamentary election defeat last year, blamed on the scandal.

But he continued to reject calls for a probe into the affair and into an allegation of stock price manipulation involving his wife and her mother.

The prosecutors’ office that investigated the allegations did not press charges against the first lady.

The past year was marked by repeated clashes with the opposition Democratic Party, while Yoon’s pro-business policies and initiatives to tackle an ageing society remained stymied. His 2025 budget was slashed by an opposition angry over his refusal to answer lingering questions about his wife.

Yoon’s struggles at home contrasted with his relative success internationally.

His push to reverse a decades-long diplomatic row with neighbouring Japan and join Tokyo in three-way security cooperation with their key mutual ally, the United States, are widely seen as his signature foreign policy achievement.

Yoon’s ability to bond on a personal level, seen as the trait that gave him his early career success, was on full display at a White House event in 2023, when he took the stage and belted out the 1970s pop hit “American Pie” for an astonished then-President Joe Biden and a delighted crowd.

Shamans, High School Buddies

Born to a well-to-do family in Seoul, Yoon excelled at school and entered the elite Seoul National University to study law. But his penchant for partying caused him to repeatedly fail the bar exam before passing on the ninth try at age 30.

Yoon shot to national fame in 2016 when, as the chief investigator probing then-President Park Geun-hye for corruption, he was asked if he was out for revenge and responded that prosecutors were not “gangsters”.

The role he played in jailing Park and his surprise appointment as head of the powerful Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office marked the start of a dizzying rise to power.

Two years later, as prosecutor-general, he spearheaded a corruption probe of a close ally to the next president, Moon Jae-in. That made him a darling of conservatives frustrated with Moon’s liberal policies, setting Yoon up to be a candidate for president in 2022.

His term got off to a rocky start when he pushed ahead with moving the presidential office from the traditional Blue House compound to a new site, sparking questions whether it was because of a feng shui belief that the old compound was cursed. Yoon denied any involvement by himself or his wife with a shaman.

When Yoon refused to fire top officials after a 2022 Halloween crowd crush killed 159 people, he was accused of protecting his “yes men”. One was Safety Minister Lee Sang-min, a graduate of Yoon’s high school.

Another alumnus of the Choongam High School in Seoul was Kim Yong-hyun, who spearheaded the presidential office move, then served as the presidential security service chief and later as defence minister. Kim, the main figure advising Yoon to declare martial law, was also charged with insurrection. He too denies the charges.

Yul, a Myongji University political science professor, said Yoon’s downfall political near-demise was likely due to him listening to the wrong people and that he probably “still thinks he did the right thing” in declaring martial law.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Global Trade War Escalates As U.S. Tariffs Spark Backlash

Countries worldwide threatened to escalate a trade war with the United States as President Donald Trump’s broad tariffs sparked concerns about significant price hikes in the world’s largest consumer market.

The penalties announced by Trump on Wednesday triggered a plunge in world financial markets on Thursday and drew condemnation from other leaders reckoning with the end of a decades-long era of trade liberalization.

But there were conflicting messages from the White House about whether the tariffs were meant to be permanent or were a tactic to win concessions, with Trump saying they “give us great power to negotiate”.

10% Baseline Tariff

The U.S. tariffs would amount to the highest trade barriers in more than a century: a 10% baseline tariff on all imports and higher targeted duties on some of the country’s biggest trading partners.

That could jack up the price for U.S. shoppers of everything from cannabis to running shoes to Apple’s iPhone. A high-end iPhone could cost nearly $2,300 if Apple passes the costs on to consumers, based on projections from Rosenblatt Securities.

Businesses raced to adjust. Automaker Stellantis said it would temporarily lay off U.S. workers and close plants in Canada and Mexico, while General Motors said it would increase U.S. production.

China, EU Vow Retaliation

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the United States had abandoned its historic role as a champion of international economic cooperation.

“The global economy is fundamentally different today than it was yesterday,” he said as he announced a limited set of countermeasures.

Elsewhere, China vowed retaliation for Trump’s 54% tariffs on imports from the world’s No. 2 economy, as did the European Union, which faces a 20% duty.

French President Emmanuel Macron called for European countries to suspend investment in the United States.

Other trading partners, including Japan, South Korea, Mexico and India, said they would hold off on any retaliation for now as they seek concessions.

Significant Risk

Washington’s allies and rivals alike warned of a devastating blow to global trade. Japan, one of the United States’ biggest trading partners and its largest foreign investor, is now facing a “national crisis”, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told parliament.

The tariffs “clearly represent a significant risk to the global outlook at a time of sluggish growth,” IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said in a statement.

“It is important to avoid steps that could further harm the world economy. We appeal to the United States and its trading partners to work constructively to resolve trade tensions and reduce uncertainty,” Georgieva said.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and senior trade adviser Peter Navarro both told cable news programs on Thursday the president would not back off, and that the tariff increases were not a negotiation.

‘Great Power To Negotiate’

Trump then appeared to contradict them, telling reporters, “The tariffs give us great power to negotiate. Always have. I used it very well in the first administration, as you saw, but now we’re taking it to a whole new level.”

Stocks suffered a global meltdown, the U.S. dollar crumbled and oil prices were set for their worst week in months as analysts warned the tariffs could upend supply chains, hurt corporate profits and push the world economy towards recession.

The Dow fell nearly 4%, its biggest one-day percentage loss since June 2020. The S&P 500 lost nearly 5% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq declined nearly 6%, its worst day in percentage terms since the pandemic era of March 2020.

Dwindling Shares

American companies with significant overseas production took a hit. Nike shares lost 14% and Apple fell 9%.

Asian shares struggled to recover as their markets opened on Friday with Japan’s Nikkei down 1.85%, extending its 2.8% slide from Thursday. Chinese markets were closed for a holiday.

Trump says the “reciprocal” tariffs are a response to barriers put on U.S. goods, while administration officials said the tariffs would create manufacturing jobs at home and open up export markets abroad, although they cautioned it would take time to see results.

Vice President JD Vance in an interview with Newsmax faulted critics for taking a short-term view.

“That’s fundamentally what this is about, the national security of manufacturing and making the things that we need, from steel to pharmaceuticals,” Vance said.

Since returning to the White House in January, Trump’s on-again, off-again tariff threats have rattled consumer and business confidence. Trump could step back again, as the reciprocal tariffs are not due to take effect until April 9.

Risk Of Recession

“The tariff plan does not appear to be well thought-out. Trade negotiations are a highly technical discipline, and in our view these proposals do not offer a serious basis for negotiations with any country,” said James Lucier, founding partner at Capital Alpha.

Economists say the tariffs could reignite inflation, raise the risk of a U.S. recession and boost costs for the average U.S. family by thousands of dollars.

Analysts said the tariffs could also alienate allies in Asia and undercut strategic efforts to contain China.

Trump has slapped a 24% tariff on Japan and a 25% tariff on South Korea, both home to major U.S. military bases. He also hit Taiwan with a 32% tariff as the island faces increased military pressure from China.

Canada and Mexico, the largest U.S. trading partners, were not hit with targeted tariffs on Wednesday, but they already face 25% tariffs on many goods and now face a separate set of tariffs on auto imports.

(With inputs from Reuters)

White Afrikaner Group From South Africa Want Trump Help For Separate State

A group of white Afrikaners was so opposed to majority Black rule when apartheid ended some three decades ago that they carved out a separatist enclave, the only town in South Africa where all residents, including menial workers, are white.

Now, the residents of Orania – population, 3,000 – in the semi-arid Karoo region want U.S. President Donald Trump to help them become a state.

Last week, community leaders from Orania visited the United States seeking recognition as an autonomous entity. South African authorities acknowledge it as a town that can raise local taxes and deliver services.

“We wanted to… gain recognition, with the American focus on South Africa now,” Orania Movement leader Joost Strydom told Reuters, on a hill strewn with bronzes of past Afrikaner leaders, including from the era of racist white minority rule that was ended by internal resistance and international outrage.

The 8,000-hectare settlement is riding an unprecedented wave of support from right-wing Americans for Afrikaner nationalists, who irrevocably lost power when apartheid ended in 1994 and Nelson Mandela became South Africa’s first Black president.

In New York and Washington the Orania leaders met influencers, think-tanks and low-ranking Republican politicians.

“We told them South Africa is such a … diverse country that it’s not a good idea to try and manage it centrally,” said Strydom.

Three senior Orania officials interviewed by Reuters were vague about the help they sought in the U.S. They said they were not seeking handouts but wanted investment to build houses to keep up with its 15% population growth, infrastructure and energy independence that it has almost half-achieved with solar.

Strydom declined to say whether his delegation had contact with the Trump administration. The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

South African foreign ministry spokesperson Chrispin Phiri told Reuters: “(Orania’s) not… a country. They are subject to the laws of South Africa and … our constitution.”

Other Afrikaner nationalist groups have also visited the U.S. to build alliances with overwhelmingly white, Republican audiences, prompting accusations back home that such trips stoke racial tensions.

The leftist Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) last week accused Orania’s leaders of “destroying the unity of this country”, a charge they reject.

‘Start Of Something’

Afrikaners are descendants of Dutch settlers who began arriving in the 1600s. They resisted the British Empire in South Africa, but once in charge of the country, they hardened racial segregation using discriminatory laws.

“There were 17,000 laws on land alone,” foreign ministry spokesperson Phiri said. “We had… to reconstruct South Africa into a country that represents all those who live in it.”

In 1991, as the end of apartheid neared, a group of about 300 Afrikaners acquired Orania, previously an abandoned water project on the muddy Orange River, to create a homeland exclusively for white Afrikaners.

“It’s the start of something,” former Orania Movement leader Carel Boshoff, said of his community, comparing its desire for independence – Orania even uses its own informal currency – to that of Israel, established after World War Two despite stiff resistance from Arabs living in that territory.

Boshoff, whose father founded the town and whose grandfather, Hendrick Verwoerd, is widely viewed as the architect of apartheid, dreams of a territory stretching to the west coast nearly 1,000 miles away.

Orania’s activities are funded through local taxes and donations from supporters and residents.

Its leaders were dismayed to find the only solution that anyone in the United States was interested in discussing was U.S. residency, after Trump offered in February to resettle white South African farmers and their families as refugees.

“We can’t be exporting our people,” Boshoff told Reuters beside a framed photo of his late grandfather. “We told them … ‘help us here’,” he said.

Some U.S. right-wingers have sought to make common cause with Afrikaners in their opposition to diversity policies that aim to empower historically unjustly-treated non-white groups. South Africa’s Black empowerment laws have been ridiculed by Trump’s South African-born adviser, Elon Musk.

Those laws were the reason Hanlie Pieters moved to Orania eight months ago, after 25 years of living in Johannesburg, to become head of marketing for the town’s technical college.

“Our children … what opportunities will they have?” Pieters said, bemoaning quotas for Black workers, while trainee plumbers and electricians honed their skills in a shed nearby.

A third of all South Africans are out of work, most of them poor Blacks.

One such unemployed man, 49-year-old Bongani Zitha, said he thought “people in Orania… are doing very well” compared to many South Africans. “So many people looking for opportunities. It’s a struggle,” he sighed.

Zitha, who has lived in a corrugated shanty town in Soweto with no piped water or sewage since 1995, said at least the people of Orania have “rights to health, education, everything”.

And unlike himself under white minority rule, he added, Orania residents are free to live wherever they want.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Trump Tariffs Threaten US-Africa Trade Programme

President Donald Trump has moved to impose sweeping tariffs on most goods imported to the United States, including from countries in Africa that benefit from a U.S. flagship trade programme for the continent.

Analysts say the new tariffs suggest that the renewal of the initiative, known as the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), is extremely unlikely.

What Is AGOA?

AGOA is a U.S. trade initiative passed in 2000 under former President Bill Clinton to deepen trade ties with Sub-Saharan Africa and help African countries develop their economies.

It provides duty-free access to the U.S. market for thousands of products including motor vehicles and parts, textiles and clothing, minerals and metals, agricultural products and chemicals exported by eligible African countries.

It has been renewed twice and is due to expire in September 2025.

Who Benefits?

About 35 African countries are currently eligible. Countries can lose and regain eligibility based on criteria including economic policies and protection of human rights.

A number of countries including South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Madagascar and Ethiopia have successfully used AGOA to boost exports to the U.S., drive industrialization and create jobs, especially in textiles, automotives and minerals including crude oil.

The United States benefits by furthering its interests on the continent. It also gains access to critical minerals and investment opportunities.

Countries that undermine U.S. national security or foreign policy interests are not eligible for AGOA.

U.S. lawmakers view it as an important soft power tool, particularly as a counter to Chinese influence.

Sectors such as South Africa’s automotive industry as well as Kenya and Lesotho’s clothing sectors would be hit hardest from a sudden rise in tariffs or non-renewal of AGOA.

What Do Critics Say?

Many analysts have said that AGOA is underutilised.

Only about half of eligible countries have developed national AGOA utilization strategies, and the majority of exports come from just a few of them.

While the apparel sector and automotive industry have been the programme’s biggest success stories, other industries have lagged.

U.S. imports from AGOA beneficiaries peaked in 2008 at $82 billion and had fallen to $29.1 billion in 2024, according to the AGOA website.

Some analysts say AGOA has had a positive impact but that it needs to be updated and improved to include newer industries such as technology and digital services.

What Happens Now?

African countries want a 10-year extension, but economists say that the Trump administration’s protectionist trade policies mean AGOA’s renewal is unlikely.

The new tariffs have heightened the risk that AGOA may be scrapped altogether even before it expires, unless the region presents strong bargaining chips to keep it in place, analysts say.

Government officials from South Africa and Madagascar said they were waiting for clarity on whether the reciprocal tariffs announced by Trump will be applied to goods that are exported under AGOA.

AGOA’s extension requires a decision of the U.S. Congress and is thereafter signed into law by the U.S. President.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Trump Fires Several White House National Security Officials, Sources Say

Several high-ranking White House National Security Council officials have been fired, according to three people familiar with the matter, in what appears to be the first significant purge of Donald Trump‘s second presidency.

It was not clear exactly why the White House National Security officials were let go or if their firing is permanent. But three of the sources said several were told there were issues with their background vetting.

One of the sources said there were also concerns about leaks to the media, while two other sources suggested the ouster was aimed broadly at officials who held views that were seen as too interventionist for the liking of Trump’s allies.

Among the several NSC officials who were fired were David Feith, a senior director overseeing technology and national security, Brian Walsh, a senior director overseeing intelligence matters, and Thomas Boodry, who oversees legislative affairs, the sources told Reuters.

The National Security Council declined to comment.

The news of the firings comes a day after an Oval Office meeting between Trump and right-wing conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer, who privately called on the president to fire some NSC staffers. The New York Times was the first to report their meeting, while Axios first reported on the NSC purge on Thursday.

Any connection between Loomer’s private suggestions and the firings was not immediately clear, and two sources said some dismissals came before Loomer met with Trump.

But multiple sources said Loomer, who has a history of peddling Islamophobic conspiracy theories, did provide Trump with a list of national security staff perceived by her to be disloyal to Trump. Loomer appeared to largely confirm that on social media on Thursday.

“It was an honor to meet with President Trump and present him with my research findings,” Loomer wrote on X.

The National Security Council has been dogged by negative headlines since March, when National Security Advisor Mike Waltz inadvertently added a journalist to a Signal chat in which top Trump officials discussed an imminent bombing campaign in Yemen.

Trump had repeatedly expressed to associates in private that he was angry with Waltz, and the advisor appeared close to losing his job, according to two sources familiar with the dynamic.

But one of the sources said in recent days that Waltz himself appeared to be safe for now.

The precise foreign policy impacts of the national security purge, if any, were unclear, and the portfolios of the fired staffers appeared to have relatively little overlap.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Germany To Equip Military With Exploding Drones For First Time

For the first time, Germany‘s military will acquire loitering munitions, or exploding drones, as Berlin seeks to modernise its arsenal and keep pace with a technology that has proven highly effective in Ukraine, two defense ministry sources said on Thursday.

Both Russia and Ukraine have fielded such single-use drones, which cruise towards their target before plummeting at velocity and detonating on impact.

But the procurement of armed or exploding drones has been controversial in Germany, with some politicians associating them with targeted extrajudicial killings by the United States military in Afghanistan.

It took years of heated debate before parliament agreed in 2022 to enable a large drone such as the Heron TP, which flies at much higher altitudes, to carry arms.

Urgent Military Upgrades

However, military upgrades are more urgent now for Germany, amid the continuing war between Russia and Ukraine and doubts about the future of U.S. military protection.

Last month, parliament approved plans for a defence spending surge worth hundreds of billions of euros.

Contracts with two companies for a first batch of exploding drones will be signed in the coming days, the sources said, declining to name the companies. The army, air force and navy will test them in the following months.

“The use of drones and the defence against drones is crucial for the survival of our troops on the modern battlefield, that’s something we learned in Ukraine,” said one of the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

“Each soldier must be capable of operating drones, just as today, everybody knows how to use binoculars.”

Germany will aim to sign longer-term contracts by the end of the year for a larger number of drones, shortening the period for introducing new weapons, which usually takes years.

As drone technology evolves rapidly, the deals will specify that companies supply a limited number initially for training purposes, and that they may be asked later to supply a larger number of the latest models at short notice, if needed.

“There’s no use in purchasing thousands of drones … only to realise they are outdated by the time we need them,” one of the sources said.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Israel Intensifies Syria Airstrikes, Accuses Turkey Of Expansionism

Israel intensified airstrikes on Syria overnight, framing them as a warning to Damascus’ new Islamist rulers while accusing their ally, Turkey, of attempting to transform the country into a Turkish protectorate.

Israel’s airstrikes, targeting air bases, a site near Syria’s capital Damascus and the southwest, put renewed focus on Israeli concerns about the Islamists who deposed Bashar al-Assad in December, with Israeli officials viewing them as a rising threat at their border.

Also suspicious of Ankara’s sway over Damascus, Israel has been working to advance its goals in Syria since Assad was toppled, seizing ground in the southwest, declaring a willingness to protect the Druze minority, lobbying Washington for a weak state, and blowing up much of the Syrian military’s heavy weapons and equipment in the days after he fell.

Militants ‘Neutralised’

The Israeli army said its forces operating in the southwest overnight killed several militants who opened fire on them. They were on a targeted mission at the time beyond the separation zone where they are deployed inside Syria, it said.

Syria’s state news agency SANA said that Israeli shelling had killed nine people in the area, during what it described as the deepest incursion yet by Israeli troops in the area.

Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that the airstrikes late on Wednesday evening were “a clear message and a warning for the future – we will not allow the security of the State of Israel to be harmed”.

Katz said in a statement that Israel’s armed forces would remain in buffer zones within Syria and act against threats to its security, warning Syria’s government it would pay a heavy price if it allowed forces hostile to Israel to enter.

Reflecting Israeli concerns about Turkish influence in the new Syria, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar accused Ankara of playing a “negative role” there, in Lebanon and other regions.

“They are doing their utmost to have Syria as a Turkish protectorate. It’s clear that is their intention,” he told a press conference in Paris.

The Syrian foreign ministry said the Israeli strikes were an unjustified escalation aimed at destabilising the country, calling on the international community to put pressure on Israel to “stop its aggression”.

Israel bombed Syria frequently when the country was governed by Assad, targeting the foothold established by his ally Iran during the civil war.

Airbase Destroyed

The latest strikes were some of the most intensive Israeli attacks in Syria since Assad was toppled.

The Syrian foreign ministry said Israel struck five separate areas within a 30-minute window, resulting in the near-complete destruction of the Hama air base and wounding dozens of civilians and soldiers.

The Israeli military said it had struck remaining military capabilities at air bases in Hama and Homs provinces, in addition to remaining military infrastructure in the Damascus area, where Syrian media and officials said the vicinity of a scientific research facility was hit.

In Hama, a Syrian military source told Reuters a dozen strikes demolished the runways, tower, arms depots and hangars at the military airport. “Israel has completely destroyed Hama air base to ensure it is not used,” the source said.

Israel also said on Wednesday it targeted the T4 air base in Homs province, which it has repeatedly hit over the past week.

In the incident in southwestern Syria, the Israeli military said its forces were operating in the Tasil area, “confiscating weapons and destroying terrorist infrastructure,” when several militants fired on them.

Residents of the Tasil area reached by phone said a group of armed locals were killed after confronting an Israeli army contingent that had arrived in the area to destroy a former Syrian army encampment.

The Israeli military said there were no casualties among its forces who “responded with fire and eliminated several armed terrorists from the ground and air”.

“The presence of weapons in southern Syria constitutes a threat to the State of Israel,” it said. “The IDF will not allow a military threat to exist in Syria and will act against it.”

(With inputs from Reuters)

Judge To Decide If Trump Defied Venezuelan Deportation Order

A mural depicting Venezuelans, whom the U.S. alleged were members of the Tren de Aragua gang and sent to the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) prison in El Salvador, is seen, in Caracas, Venezuela, April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Gaby Oraa

A U.S. judge will hold a hearing on Thursday to determine whether the Trump administration defied his order halting the deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members under a seldom-used 18th-century law.

Washington-based U.S. District Judge James Boasberg on March 15 imposed a two-week ban on the Trump administration’s deportations of accused members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, while he considered a lawsuit brought by some Venezuelan migrants challenging the legality of the law’s use to speed up their removal.

Boasberg is now probing whether Republican President Donald Trump‘s administration violated that order by failing to return two deportation flights that were in the air at the time he issued the order. The Venezuelan migrants aboard the planes were handed over to officials in El Salvador, where they are being held.

The hearing starts at 3 p.m. EDT (1900 GMT).

Concerns Over Court Rulings

The episode has prompted concerns among Democrats and some legal observers that the Trump administration may not comply with unfavorable court rulings. Trump called for Boasberg’s impeachment after he blocked the deportations.

That prompted a rare rebuke from U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts, who said appeals, not impeachments, were the proper response to disagreements with court orders.

The Trump administration says it did not violate Boasberg’s order. In a March 25 court filing, Justice Department lawyers wrote that the migrants had already been deported by the time the judge ruled because the planes had left U.S. airspace.

They also said Boasberg could not order the executive branch to bring the alleged members of Tren de Aragua, which the Trump administration labels a terrorist organization, back from overseas.

“Courts lack authority to micromanage how the President decides to deal with terrorists abroad,” the Justice Department lawyers wrote.

The government has also invoked the state secrets privilege, a doctrine preventing sensitive government information from being disclosed in civil litigation, to avoid giving Boasberg more details about the timing of the flights.

Lawyers for the Venezuelan migrants said in a March 31 filing that Boasberg’s order was clearly intended to prevent them from being handed over to a foreign government, meaning the Trump administration violated it.

Deported Under ‘Alien Enemies Act’

The migrants’ lawyers say they were not given a chance to contest the government’s assertion that they were Tren de Aragua members before being deported under the Alien Enemies Act. The law, best-known for its use to intern and remove Japanese, German, and Italian immigrants during World War Two, allows foreign nationals to be deported without final removal orders from immigration judges.

Immigration lawyers, family members and advocates said authorities are targeting young Venezuelan men who are not gang members on the mistaken belief that their tattoos honoring family members, their professions, and even soccer teams signify Tren de Aragua membership.

Boasberg on Friday extended his temporary restraining order for another two weeks, as lawyers for the migrants seek a longer-lasting preliminary injunction.

The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Boasberg’s initial order, after an appeals court upheld it.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Trump’s Tariff Policy Baffles The World, Hits The Poor Hardest

Mocked for imposing trade tariffs on frozen, sparsely inhabited islands dominated by penguins, Donald Trump‘s tariff calculation method has a significant impact—it disproportionately affects some of the world’s poorest nations.

The math is simple: take the U.S. goods trade deficit with a country, divide it by that country’s exports to the U.S. and turn it into a percentage figure; then cut that figure in half to produce the U.S. “reciprocal” tariff, with a floor of 10%.

That’s how the volcanic Australian territory of Heard Island and McDonald Islands in the Antarctic ended up with a 10% tariff. The penguins got off lightly, you might say.

But Madagascar – one of the poorest nations in the world with a gross domestic product (GDP) per head of just over $500 – meanwhile faces a 47% tariff on the modest $733 million of exports of vanilla, metals and apparel that it did with the U.S. last year.

“Presumably no one is buying Teslas there,” John Denton, head of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), told Reuters, an ironic reference to the improbability of Madagascar being able to placate Trump by buying upmarket U.S. products.

Madagascar is not alone: the bluntness of the formula as applied to economies which cannot afford to import much from the U.S. inevitably leads to a high reciprocal tally: 50% for Lesotho in Southern Africa, 49% for Cambodia in Southeast Asia.

“The biggest losers are Africa and Southeast Asia,” said Denton, adding the move “risks further damaging the development prospects of countries already facing worsening terms of trade”.

Rich Nations Also Stung

However, Trump’s trade tariff formula is also sowing confusion among rich countries. For the European Union, it has produced a punitive tariff of 20% – four times the 5% which the World Trade Organization calculates as the EU’s average tariff rate.

“So, at least for us, it is a colossal inaccuracy,” said Stefano Berni, General Manager of the consortium representing makers of the Grana Padano speciality cheese in Italy.

“It costs us three times as much today to enter the U.S. as it does for U.S. cheeses to enter our market,” he said in a statement.

Asked about Trump’s trade tariffs’ methodology, White House Deputy Press Secretary Kush Desai posted on X that “we literally calculated tariff and non-tariff barriers” and included a screenshot of a White House paper setting out the algebra behind the formula.

Asked on CNBC how the Trump administration came up with the formula, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick did not directly explain it but said United States Trade Representative (USTR) economists had worked for years on a metric that reflected all trade barriers set up by a given country.

But economists across the world rushed to point out that the terms cancelled each other out in such a way that it could be reduced to a simple quotient of goods trade deficit over goods trade exports.

“There is really no methodology there,” said Mary Lovely, Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute. “It is like finding you have cancer and finding the medication is based on your weight divided by your age. The word ‘reciprocal’ is deeply misleading.”

Robert Kahn, managing director, global macro for Eurasia Group consultancy, agreed that it produced “a lot of these kinds of nonsense numbers that aren’t material”.

“It sends a signal … that we are pulling back from our relationships and alliances with them and is a cold shower to a lot of our traditional allies,” he told Reuters.

Others noted that it also raised questions over the widely held view that Trump is launching an opening gambit in what will be one-on-one discussions with individual countries that will ultimately see the new U.S. tariffs sharply reduced.

“The U.S. has chosen a methodology that is essentially mechanical,” said Stephen Adams, a former European trade adviser who now works for Global Counsel consultancy.

“One practical question it does raise is whether there’s any scope to negotiate this away … The U.S. hasn’t identified any specific measures that might be changed in order to convince the president to change his mind.”

(With inputs from Reuters)

Israeli Military Investigates Deaths Of Gaza Aid Workers

The Israeli military has launched a special investigation into the deaths of several emergency and aid workers in Gaza, a spokesperson said on Thursday, while dismissing claims that the incident amounted to an “execution.”

Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani said the military’s Southern Command had transferred the investigation to a general staff mechanism outside the chain of command to establish what had happened and “hold accountable people if we need to”.

The spokesperson emphasized that the military follows strict protocols to minimize civilian casualties and that the investigation aims to determine the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Humanitarian organizations have called for transparency in the probe, urging Israel to ensure the safety of aid workers operating in conflict zones.

Last month, the bodies of 15 workers from the Red Crescent, Palestinian Civil Defence and United Nations were found buried in a shallow grave at the southern end of the Gaza Strip, close to their wrecked vehicles.

Red Crescent Blames Military

The Red Crescent said Israeli forces, which resumed military operations in Gaza on March 18 after a two month truce, had targeted the workers.

Israel has said that on March 23 its troops fired on vehicles bearing Red Crescent markings that were carrying Hamas militants, and killed nine of them.

“Our initial investigation found that there were terrorists in these cars, using those Red Crescent cars,” Shoshani told a briefing with journalists.

Asked how the troops knew that there were militants in the cars, he said: “It is based on different ways of intelligence and also based on the information gathered on the ground at the time of the event”.

He said troops later also fired on other unmarked vehicles that approached without emergency lights or prior coordination.

He denied a report in Britain’s Guardian newspaper that some bodies in the grave had been found with hands tied, and rejected the term “execution” to describe what happened during what he called “an operational event”.

“Not an execution,” he said.

(With inputs from Reuters)

ICC Prosecutor Khan Faces Retaliation Claims Amid Sexual Misconduct Allegation

U.N. investigators probing sexual misconduct allegations against International Criminal Court Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan are also examining claims of retaliation linked to the accusations, according to five sources briefed on the matter.

The allegations being examined are that Khan retaliated against staff who reported allegations of sexual misconduct towards a female lawyer reporting to him or were critical of his handling of the matter, said three sources with direct knowledge of the U.N. investigation.

The five sources, all of whom asked not to be named due to concerns of reprisals, said Khan, who is British, had demoted at least four staff in his office.

In a written statement, Khan’s attorneys rejected all allegations of wrongdoing and said he “looks forward to cooperating fully and transparently with the external investigation”.

“We refer you to what our client has said previously in this regard, including his firm denials. You will appreciate that our client cannot be expected to provide a running commentary on these matters,” law firm Carter-Ruck said.

“He has not engaged in sexual misconduct of any kind and nor, to be clear, has he engaged in any ‘retaliatory behaviour’ as alleged.”

Carter-Ruck did not comment on whether the U.N. probe included examining allegations of retaliatory conduct.

Khan has vowed to continue working while cooperating with the inquiry, and said that the original allegations, made last October, coincided with a campaign of misinformation against his office.

ICC Prosecutors Probe Top Figures

ICC prosecutors are investigating several high-profile figures including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The court has issued an arrest warrant for Putin on suspicion of deporting children from Ukraine, and for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes in Gaza. Neither country is a member of the court and both deny the accusations and reject ICC jurisdiction.

The ICC’s investigation into Israel’s conduct led the U.S. to impose sanctions on Khan, which the ICC president says have put the court itself at risk.

Khan has not yet been questioned for the inquiry, which is being conducted by the U.N.’s Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), the sources said.

The ICC and an OIOS official declined to comment on the inquiry into Khan.

The court’s governing body, which commissioned the U.N. inquiry, declined to comment on its scope, saying that further information could only be shared once the investigation was finished.

The ICC is a permanent court that can prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression in member states or by their nationals. Its 125 members include all European Union countries, Japan, Britain, Canada and Brazil, but not the United States, China or Russia.

(With inputs from Reuters)

US Will Stay In NATO, But It Must Be ‘Stronger’, Rubio Says

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio reaffirmed America’s commitment to NATO on Thursday but emphasised that European allies must significantly increase their defence spending, while assuring that the U.S. would allow them some time to meet the demand.

Rubio spoke as he met fellow NATO foreign ministers gathered in Brussels, with Europeans hoping he would dispel doubts about the U.S. stance even with tensions rising over President Donald Trump’s steep new trade tariffs.

The Trump administration’s words and actions have raised questions about the future of NATO, the transatlantic alliance that has been the bedrock of European security for the past 75 years.

“The United States is in NATO … The United States is as active in NATO as it has ever been,” Rubio told reporters, dismissing doubts about that commitment as “hysteria”.

Rubio added that Trump was “not against NATO. He is against a NATO that does not have the capabilities that it needs to fulfil the obligations that the treaty imposes upon each and every member state.”

Trump has said the military alliance should spend 5% of gross domestic product on defence – a huge increase from the current 2% goal and a level that no NATO country, including the United States, currently reaches.

Washington has also bluntly told European countries that it can no longer be primarily focused on the continent’s security.

European allies have been anxiously seeking details on the timeframe and extent to which the U.S. aims to reduce its engagement in NATO for weeks, in order to coordinate the process of a European defence ramp-up to avoid security gaps in Europe.

Spend More

In Brussels, Rubio brought some element of response to that.

“We do want to leave here with an understanding that we are on a pathway, a realistic pathway, to every single one of the members committing and fulfilling a promise to reach up to 5% of spending,” he said, adding that this included the United States.

“No one expects that you’re going to be able to do this in one year or two. But the pathway has to be real.”

European ministers are expected to use the meeting to showcase their plans to boost defence spending.

According to NATO estimates, 23 of the alliance’s 32 members met or exceeded the 2% target last year. Some of the continent’s big economies, such as Italy and Spain, were among those below the target, at around 1.5% and 1.3% respectively.

European ministers are also likely to use the meeting to try to influence the talks Trump has initiated with Russia over the war in Ukraine, which was triggered by Moscow’s 2022 invasion.

European belief in the U.S. as the continent’s ultimate protector against any attack from Russia has been severely shaken by Trump’s attempted rapprochement with Moscow and heavy pressure on Kyiv as he seeks to end the war.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Trump Escalates Trade War Amid Global Tariff Turmoil

U.S. President Donald Trump‘s decision to impose broad tariffs on U.S. imports triggered threats of retaliation on Thursday, as businesses and governments scrambled to assess the impact of an intensifying trade war that could disrupt global alliances.

The penalties announced on Wednesday unleashed turbulence across world markets and drew condemnation from other leaders facing the end of an era of trade liberalisation that has shaped the global order for decades.

Donald Trump said he would impose a 10% baseline tariff on all imports to the United States and higher duties on some of the country’s biggest trading partners, hammering goods from premium Italian coffee and Japanese whisky to sportswear made in Asia.

According to Fitch Ratings, the new U.S. tariffs are the highest in more than a century.

As investors digested the news on Thursday, stock markets in Beijing and Tokyo sank to multi-month lows. European shares were also down sharply in morning trade, with top goods exporter Germany hit hard.

Wall Street futures sank as investors shed riskier assets in favour of safe-haven bonds and gold.

Germany’s IW research institute estimated the tariffs would wipe 750 billion euros ($833.63 billion) from the EU economy.

Trump said the “reciprocal” tariffs were a response to duties and other non-tariff barriers put on U.S. goods. He argued that the new levies will boost manufacturing jobs at home.

Facing 54% tariffs on exports to the U.S., the world’s No. 2 economy, China vowed countermeasures, as did the European Union, as Washington’s allies and rivals alike criticised moves they fear will deal a devastating blow to global trade.

“Uncertainty will spiral and trigger the rise of further protectionism. The consequences will be dire for millions of people around the globe,” EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said, adding the 27-member bloc was preparing to hit back if talks with Washington failed.

U.S. Treasury Chief Scott Bessent earlier warned any retaliatory moves would only lead to escalation.

Tiny Territories, Uninhabited Islands Hit

Among close U.S. allies, the European Union was targeted with a 20% rate, Japan with 24%, South Korea with 25% and Taiwan with 32%. Even some tiny territories and uninhabited islands in the Antarctic were hit by tariffs, according to a list posted by the White House on X.

Donald Trump’s tariffs also looked set to shake up established trade ties in favour of new relationships.

“Opportunities for new alliances are emerging that we should use determinedly and decisively,” said Robert Habeck, the economy minister of Germany, whose biggest trading partner is the United States.

Recent meetings showed “that what we think is what they think, too: forging an alliance, for example, with Canada and Mexico, is the order of the day,” he said, adding “we, the European Union, should pragmatically explore free trade options with other countries.”

Trump’s tariffs come at a time when relations with much of Europe have plummeted over issues such as the war in Ukraine and the upending of decades-old transatlantic ties, with the U.S. acting as the ultimate guarantor of European security.

The issue spilled over into a meeting of the NATO alliance in Brussels on Thursday, where the U.S. is pushing for countries to sharply raise their defence spending.

Norway’s Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide said NATO’s founding after World War Two was based on countries not using “coercive” economic measures against one another, while German, French and Belgian foreign ministers also criticised the tariffs.

Anthony Albanese, prime minister of Australia, a nation often described as America’s “deputy sheriff” in Asia, said Trump’s move was not the act of a friend.

“The (Trump) administration’s tariffs have no basis in logic and they go against the basis of our two nations’ partnership.”

Outside economists have warned that tariffs could slow the global economy, raise the risk of recession, and increase living costs for the average American family by thousands of dollars.

“This is how you sabotage the world’s economic engine while claiming to supercharge it,” said Nigel Green, CEO of global financial advisory deVere Group. “The reality is stark: these tariffs will push prices higher on thousands of everyday goods – from phones to food – and that will fuel inflation at a time when it is already uncomfortably persistent.”

Canada and Mexico, the two largest U.S. trading partners, already face 25% tariffs on many goods and will not face additional levies from Wednesday’s announcement.

They will be hit by a separate set of tariffs on auto imports that Trump announced last week will take effect starting on Thursday.

Tariff concerns have already slowed manufacturing activity across the globe, while also spurring sales of autos and other imported products as consumers rush to make purchases before prices rise.

Now as the reality of the new tariffs sinks in, companies around the world must weigh up how to adjust, with their options limited and unpalatable for their customers.

“It’s an immense difficulty for Europe. I think it’s also a catastrophe for the United States and for U.S. citizens,” said French Prime Minister François Bayrou.

($1 = 0.8997 euros)

(With inputs from Reuters)

Netanyahu Praises Hungary’s Withdrawal From ICC During Budapest Visit

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Hungary for its “bold and principled” move to exit the International Criminal Court during his visit to Budapest on Thursday, marking a rare international trip despite an ICC arrest warrant.

Netanyahu, invited by Hungary’s right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orban, faces the ICC arrest warrant over allegations of war crimes in Gaza as Israel has expanded its military operation in the Palestinian enclave.

Hungary has rejected the idea of arresting the Israeli prime minister and has called the warrant “brazen”.

In an announcement timed with Netanyahu’s visit on Thursday, Orban said Hungary would withdraw completely from the ICC, an organisation set up more than two decades ago to prosecute those accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.

“This is no longer an impartial court, a rule-of-law court, but rather a political court. This has become the clearest in light of its decisions on Israel,” Orban said at a news conference with Netanyahu where they did not take questions.

Orban’s Invitation

Orban had invited his Israeli counterpart to Budapest in November, a day after the arrest warrant was issued over Israel’s offensive in Gaza, launched after an attack by the Palestinian Islamist militant group Hamas on southern Israel.

Israel has rejected the ICC accusations, saying they are politically motivated and fuelled by antisemitism. It says the ICC has lost all legitimacy by issuing the warrants against a democratically elected leader of a country exercising the right of self-defence.

“You stand with us at the EU, you stand with us at the UN and you’ve just taken a bold and principled position on the ICC… it’s important for all democracies to stand up to this corrupt organisation,” Netanyahu told Orban.

An ICC spokesperson had no immediate comment on the criticism from Orban and Netanyahu.

The court has previously said its decision to pursue warrants against Israeli officials was in line with its approach in all cases and that it is not for states to unilaterally determine the soundness of its legal decisions.

The visit to Hungary was only Netanyahu’s second trip abroad since the ICC announced the warrants, following a visit to Washington in February to meet U.S. President Donald Trump.

As a founding member of the ICC, Hungary is theoretically obliged to arrest and hand over anyone subject to a warrant from the court. Hungary ratified the ICC’s founding document in 2001, but the law has not been promulgated.

Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp of the Netherlands, which hosts the ICC, said on Thursday that until its withdrawal from the ICC was complete, which he said takes about a year, Hungary must still meet its duties.

EU Nations Divided On ICC Warrant

European Union countries have been split on the ICC warrant.

Some said last year they would meet their ICC commitments, while Italy has said there were legal doubts, and France has said it believed Netanyahu had immunity to ICC actions.

Germany’s next chancellor Friedrich Merz said in February he would find a way for Netanyahu to visit without being arrested.

Hungary’s Orban is an important Israeli ally who has acted to block EU statements or actions critical of Israel.

The Israeli campaign has killed more than 50,000 Palestinians, according to Palestinian health authorities, and devastated the Gaza Strip. The Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, killed 1,200 people and saw more than 250 taken hostage, according to Israeli tallies.

Hamas condemned Hungary’s decision, calling it “a slap in the face to the principle of international justice”.

The ICC also issued an arrest warrant against a Hamas leader, Mohammed Deif, in November. His death was confirmed after the warrant was issued.

Prosecutors had also sought to arrest Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh and the group’s leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar. Both were killed by Israel before the request was approved.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Thousands Flee Gaza As Israel Seizes Rafah In New ‘Security Zone’

Palestinians make their way with belongings as they flee their homes, after the Israeli army issued evacuation orders, in the Shujaiya neighborhood of Gaza City, April 3, 2025. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa

Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled Gaza for safety on Thursday in one of the war’s largest mass displacements, as Israel’s forces pushed deeper into the ruins of Rafah, advancing into a newly declared “security zone” they plan to control.

A day after declaring their intention to capture large swathes of the crowded enclave, Israel’s forces pushed into the city on Gaza’s southern edge, which had served as a last refuge for people fleeing other areas for much of the war.

Gaza’s health ministry reported at least 97 people killed in Israeli strikes in the past 24 hours, including at least 20 killed in an airstrike around dawn in the Shejaia suburb of Gaza City.

‘Rafah Is Gone’

Rafah “is gone, it is being wiped out,” a father of seven among the hundreds of thousands who had fled from Rafah to neighbouring Khan Younis, told Reuters via a chat app.

“They are knocking down what is left standing of houses and property,” said the man who declined to be identified for fear of repercussions.

After a strike killed several people in Khan Younis, Adel Abu Fakher was checking the damage to his tent.

“Is anything left for us? There’s nothing left for us. We’re being killed while asleep,” he said.

The assault to capture Rafah is a major escalation in the war, which Israel restarted last month after effectively abandoning a ceasefire in place since January.

Gazans Fear Permanent Depopulation

Israel has not spelled out its long-term aims for the security zone in Gaza, which its troops are now seizing. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said troops were taking an area he called the “Morag Axis”, a reference to an abandoned former Israeli settlement once located between Rafah on Gaza’s southern edge and the adjacent main southern city Khan Younis.

Gazans who had returned to homes in the ruins during the ceasefire have now been ordered to flee communities on the northern and southern edges of the strip.

They fear that Israel’s intention is to depopulate those areas indefinitely, leaving many hundreds of thousands of people permanently homeless in one of the poorest and most crowded territories on earth. The security zone includes some of Gaza’s last agricultural land and critical water infrastructure.

Fragile Ceasefire

Since the first phase of the ceasefire expired at the start of March with no agreement to prolong it, Israel has imposed a total blockade on all goods reaching Gaza’s 2.3 million residents, recreating what international organisations describe as a humanitarian catastrophe after weeks of relative calm.

Israel’s stated goal since the start of the war has been the destruction of the Hamas militant group, which ran Gaza for nearly two decades and led the attack on Israeli communities in October 2023 that precipitated the war.

But with no effort made to establish an alternative administration, Hamas-led police returned to the streets during the ceasefire. Fighters still hold 59 dead and living hostages, which Israel says must be handed over to extend the truce; Hamas says it will free them only under a deal that ends the war.

Israeli leaders say they have been encouraged by signs of protest in Gaza against Hamas, with hundreds of people demonstrating in north Gaza’s Beit Lahiya on Wednesday opposing the war and demanding Hamas quit power. Hamas calls the protesters collaborators and says Israel is behind them.

Israel-Hamas War

The war began with a Hamas attack on Israeli communities on October 7, 2023, with gunmen killing 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages according to Israeli tallies. Israel’s campaign has so far killed more than 50,000 Palestinians, Gaza health authorities say.

Rafah residents said most of the local population had followed Israel’s order to leave, as Israeli strikes toppled buildings there. But a strike on the main road between Khan Younis and Rafah stopped most movement between the two cities.

Movement of people and traffic along the western coastal road near Morag was also limited by bombardment, said residents.

“Others stayed because they don’t know where to go, or got fed up with being displaced several times. We are afraid they might be killed or at best detained,” said Basem, a resident of Rafah who declined to give a second name.

Markets have emptied and prices for basic necessities have soared under Israel’s total blockade of food, medicine and fuel.

The Palestinian Health Ministry, which is based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank but has nominal authority over hospitals in Gaza, said Gaza’s entire healthcare system was at risk of collapse.

(With inputs from Reuters)