NEW DELHI: China’s reaction to the Quad—involving the U.S., India, Japan and Australia—has wavered from being dismissive to calling the grouping ‘Asian NATO’ and a security threat. There can never be a NATO in the Indo-Pacific; such an arrangement is just not suitable there, says James Carafano, who heads the defence and security vertical at The Heritage Foundation in the United States. The Indo-Pacific has the smartest and most advanced security architecture on the planet—Quad, trilaterals, bilaterals, 2+2, he told StratNews Global Editor-in-Chief Nitin A. Gokhale on ‘The Gist’. Jeff Smith, Research Fellow, South Asia at The Heritage Foundation, who was part of the discussion, said when it comes to the Quad, China is stuck. “If it pushes too hard, India will come closer to the grouping and if it doesn’t say anything, the grouping would develop organically anyway.”
April 21, 2022
April 19, 2022
- Russian Energy Calculus And The Western Duplicity
- ‘Western Imagination Failure That Russia Wanted To Finish Ops In Days, Change Ukraine Government’
- Should India Buy Heavily Discounted Russian Oil, Energy Assets Of Exiting Western Companies?
- Expect Full-Throttle Pushback By Russia & China Against Quad: Vijay Gokhale
- Can’t Follow LAC Protocols Selectively: Army Chief On India-China Standoff