Home US Elections Trump Hush Money Case Sentencing After November Presidential Polls

Trump Hush Money Case Sentencing After November Presidential Polls

Trump was convicted in May 30 of falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 payment to an adult film actress for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump a decade earlier.

A New York judge on Friday delayed former U.S. President Donald Trump’s sentencing on charges stemming from hush money paid to a porn star until after the November 5 election.

Trump, the Republican nominee for president, had previously been scheduled to be sentenced on September 18, less than two months before the election. He asked Justice Juan Merchan to push back his sentencing date until after the vote.

Merchan said on Friday he now planned to sentence Trump on November 26, unless the case is dismissed before then.

“This matter is one that stands alone in a unique place in this Nation’s history,” Merchan wrote. “Unfortunately, we are now at a place in time that is fraught with complexities rendering the requirements of a sentencing hearing, should one be necessary, difficult to execute.”

Trump’s lawyers in August argued there would not be enough time before the sentencing for the defence to potentially appeal Merchan’s forthcoming ruling on Trump’s request to overturn the conviction due to the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision on presidential immunity.

Merchan had been scheduled to rule on that motion on September 16. He wrote on Friday he now plans to rule on that motion on November 12.

Nitin A Gokhale WhatsApp Channel

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling, which related to a separate criminal case Trump faces, found that presidents cannot be criminally prosecuted for their official acts, and that evidence of presidents’ official actions cannot be used to help prove criminal cases involving unofficial actions.

Prosecutors with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office argued their case involved Trump’s personal conduct, not official acts, so there was no reason to overturn the verdict.

But they took no position on Trump’s request to delay sentencing, saying in an August 16 filing they deferred to Merchan on the question. The prosecutors said an appellate court could delay the sentencing anyway to give itself time to consider Trump’s arguments, a move they said would be “disruptive.”

Bragg’s team also said Trump’s court appearances required significant security and logistical planning and said there was a risk preparations could be made for his sentencing only to be called off. Trump’s six-week trial brought a heavy police presence to lower Manhattan.

In declining to advocate for a sentencing date before the election, Bragg may have been conscious of Trump’s oft-repeated claim that the Democratic prosecutor is seeking to interfere in his campaign, said George Grasso, a retired New York state judge who attended Trump’s trial.

“He’s probably appropriately sensitive to opening himself up to charges from Trump and Trump supporters that he’s being too political,” Grasso said. “He threaded the needle.”

In the first-ever criminal trial of a former or current U.S. president, Trump was convicted on May 30 of falsifying business records to cover up his then-lawyer’s $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump a decade earlier.

Trump denies the encounter and has vowed to appeal the verdict once he is sentenced.
Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years in prison, though punishments such as fines or probation are more common for others convicted of that crime in the past.

If Trump wins the White House, he could potentially order the Department of Justice to drop federal election interference charges against him. He would not have the authority to end the New York state case or an election interference case in Georgia.
(REUTERS)

Previous articleThis Edible Yellow Dye Lets People See Through Your Skin
Next articleBrazil Human Rights Minister Accused Of Sexually Harassing Several Women
In a career spanning over three decades and counting, I’ve been the Foreign Editor of The Telegraph, Outlook Magazine and The New Indian Express. I helped set up rediff.com’s editorial operations in San Jose and New York, helmed sify.com, and was the founder editor of India.com.

My work has featured in national and international publications like the Al Jazeera Centre for Studies, Global Times and The Asahi Shimbun. My one constant over all these years, however, has been the attempt to understand rising India’s place in the world.

On demand, I can rustle up a mean salad, my oil-less pepper chicken is to die for, and depending on the time of the day, all it takes to rock my soul is some beer and some jazz or good ole rhythm & blues.

Talk to me about foreign and strategic affairs, media, South Asia, China, and of course India.