The White House on Wednesday proposed ending U.S. funding for nearly two dozen global programmes focused on war crimes and accountability, including initiatives in Myanmar, Syria, and investigations into alleged Russian atrocities in Ukraine, according to two U.S. sources and internal documents reviewed by Reuters.
The recommendation from the Office of Management and Budget, which has not been previously reported, is not the final decision to end the programmes since it gives the State Department the option to appeal.
But it sets up a potential back-and-forth between the OMB and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his aides, who will reply to OMB with their suggestions on which programmes deserve to continue. The programmes also include work in Iraq, Nepal, Sri Lanka and the Gambia.
The State Department and OMB did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Slim Hopes For Reversal
The expectation that Rubio would argue for many of the programmes to be continued is slim, according to two U.S. officials. However, the top U.S. diplomat could make a case to keep crucial programmes, such as aiding potential war crimes prosecutions in Ukraine, according to one source familiar with the matter.
Several of the programmes earmarked for termination operate war crimes accountability projects in Ukraine, three sources familiar with the matter said, including Global Rights Compliance, which is helping to collect evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity across Ukraine, such as sexual violence and torture.
Another is the Legal Action Network, a legal aid group which supports local efforts to bring cases against Russian suspects of war crimes in Ukraine, the sources said.
Requests seeking comment from the groups were not immediately answered.
State Department bureaus that would like to preserve any war crimes and accountability programmes should send their justifications by close of business day on July 11, said an internal State Department email seen by Reuters.
Changing Priorities
The administration of President Donald Trump has frozen and then cut back billions of dollars of foreign aid since taking office on January 20 to ensure American taxpayers’ money funds programmes that are aligned with his “America First” policies.
The unprecedented cutbacks have effectively shut down its premier aid arm, the U.S. Agency for International Development, jeopardised the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos.
The OMB recommendation is yet another sign that the administration is increasingly de-prioritising advocacy for human rights and the rule of law globally, an objective that previous U.S. administrations have pursued.
While U.S. foreign aid freezes had already started hampering an international effort to hold Russia responsible for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, Wednesday’s recommendations raise the risk of the U.S. completely abandoning those efforts.
Among the programmes that are recommended for termination is a $18 million State Department grant for Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office that is implemented by Georgetown University’s International Criminal Justice Initiative, two sources said.
While the programmes do not directly impact Ukraine’s frontline efforts to fend off Russia’s invasion, supporters say they represent the best chance of extensively documenting reported battlefield atrocities in Europe’s biggest conflict since World War Two, now grinding toward a fourth year.
Ukraine has opened more than 140,000 war crime cases since Moscow’s February 2022 invasion, which has killed tens of thousands, ravaged vast swathes of the country and left behind mental and physical scars from occupation. Russia consistently denies that war crimes have been committed by its forces in the conflict.
Path To Appeal
Other programmes include one that does accountability work on Myanmar army’s atrocities against Rohingya minorities, as well as on the persecution of Christians and other minorities by Syria’s ousted former president Bashar al-Assad, two sources said.
While the OMB recommendations could face State Department pushback, the criteria to appeal are set very strictly.
In an internal State Department email, the administration cautioned that any effort to preserve programmes that were recommended to be terminated should be thoroughly argued and directly aligned with Washington’s priorities.
“Bureaus must clearly and succinctly identify direct alignment to administration priorities,” the email, reviewed by Reuters, said.
(With inputs from Reuters)
