Home Blog Page 16

Hegseth To Visit Panama Canal After Trump’s Takeback Threat

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is set to tour the Panama Canal on Tuesday, beginning a rare visit to a Central American nation still uneasy over President Donald Trump’s threats to reclaim control of the waterway.

Hegseth, the first U.S. defense secretary to visit in decades, arrives at a particularly delicate moment as Panama wrestles with deep U.S. concerns about Chinese commercial investments around the canal.

He is also visiting following reports that the Trump administration has requested options from the U.S. military to ensure access to the canal, which the United States built more than a century ago and handed over to Panama in 1999.

Given Trump’s tough rhetoric about retaking the canal, the stakes are high for Hegseth’s visit.

US-Panama Security Relationship

Panama will be watching for signs of the direction he wants to take the U.S.-Panama security relationship, and for the canal itself, along which the United States once had a network of military bases.

“On the whole, this hasn’t been a winning issue for the United States in terms of public diplomacy in Panama,” said Ryan Berg, director of the Americas Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Till, current and former U.S. officials and experts say the United States has found a willing partner in tackling Chinese influence in Panama’s president, Jose Raul Mulino.

BRI Exit

In February, Mulino announced Panama’s formal move to exit China’s Belt and Road Initiative, and he has aided Trump’s crackdown on migrants.

He has accepted deportation flights of non-Panamanians and worked to stem migration from South America by those crossing through his country’s dangerous Darien jungle.

Hegseth made no public remarks as he arrived in Panama late on Monday.

But he has enthusiastically backed Trump’s southern-focused security agenda, by means such as dispatching U.S. troops to the U.S. border with Mexico and offering military aircraft for deportation flights.

Trump has falsely claimed that China is operating the canal and that Chinese soldiers are present.

But experts acknowledge U.S. security concerns, particularly regarding espionage, with an expansive Chinese commercial presence in Panama that also includes plans by Chinese firms to build a bridge over the canal.

BlackRock Deal

Last month, Trump celebrated a deal led by U.S. firm BlackRock to buy most of the $22.8-billion ports business of Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison, including its ports on either end of the Panama Canal.

Trump said the purchase was an example of how the United States was “reclaiming” the canal.

But China has criticized it, with the market regulator saying it will carry out an antitrust review of the deal.

Current and former U.S. officials say the Panama Canal would be critical for the passage of U.S. warships during any future conflict in Asia, since Navy vessels would transit from the Atlantic to the Pacific to support the war effort.

China’s Advantage

Even without blocking the canal, China could have an enormous advantage by being able to surveil vessels passing through it.

Still, John Feeley, who was U.S. ambassador to Panama from 2015 to 2018, disputed the Trump administration’s assertion that China’s presence in Panama was a violation of the U.S.-Panama treaty.

“What’s not legitimate about the way Trump has gone about this is the bullying tactic that he’s used, which is to claim that there has been a violation of the neutrality treaty. There hasn’t been,” Feeley said.

Mulino has defended Panama’s administration of the canal, saying it has been handled responsibly for world trade, including that of the United States, and that it “is, and will continue to be, Panamanian.”

More than 40% of U.S. container traffic, valued at roughly $270 billion a year, transits the Panama Canal, accounting for more than two-thirds of vessels passing each day through the world’s second-busiest interoceanic waterway.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Putin Envoy Lauds US-Russia Space Ties After Soyuz Launch

Russian President Vladimir Putin‘s investment envoy on Tuesday praised U.S.-Russia space cooperation following the launch of a Russian Soyuz rocket carrying an American astronaut and two Russian cosmonauts to the International Space Station (ISS).

Soyuz MS-27

The Soyuz MS-27 was carrying Russians Sergei Ryzhikov and Alexei Zubritsky and NASA’s Jonathan Kim. It was expected to dock at the ISS at 0904 GMT, Roscosmos, Russia’s space agency, said.

Kirill Dmitriev, who is trying to spur a reset in U.S.-Russia ties and held talks in Washington last week, said Tuesday’s launch from the Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan was the latest example of an enduring relationship which traces its history back to 1975.

That was when the first crewed international space mission carried out jointly by the United States and the Soviet Union saw an Apollo and a Soyuz dock in space.

Symbol Of ‘Cold War Detente’

That mission, which featured the first international handshake in space, was a symbol of Cold War detente.

“Russian and U.S. cooperation in the space industry continues today,” Dmitriev said on Tuesday, posting a video on his official Telegram channel of the Soyuz rocket blasting off.

Despite sweeping U.S. sanctions imposed on Moscow over its war in Ukraine, space is one area where cooperation has continued.

Dmitriev, who has talked up the possibility of joint Russian-U.S. investment in the Arctic and the development of Russian rare earths, has said Moscow could supply a small nuclear power plant for a mission to Mars planned by billionaire entrepreneur and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.

However, with the ISS nearing the end of its service life, Russia plans to go it alone with its own space station, for which it plans to launch the first two modules in 2027. It is also expanding its cooperation with China in space exploration.

(With inputs from Reuters)

EU Border Agency Probes 12 Alleged Migrant Rights Violations By Greece

A migrant throws a stone, while others climb a fence at the border, as they clash with Greek riot police at Turkey's Pazarkule border crossing with Greece's Kastanies, near Edirne, Turkey, March 6, 2020. REUTERS/Marko Djurica/File Photo

The EU border agency announced on Tuesday that it was reviewing 12 potential human rights violations by Greece, including allegations of migrant pushbacks—a practice for which Athens has previously faced criticism from the European court.

Greece, for years a favoured gateway to Europe for migrants and refugees from the Middle East, Africa and Asia, has been accused by human rights groups of forcefully returning asylum-seekers on its sea and land borders, a practice it denies.

“There are currently 12 active Serious Incident Reports related to Greece under review by the Fundamental Rights Office. Each is being examined thoroughly,” Chris Borowski, spokesperson for EU border agency Frontex, said on Tuesday.

Border Pushbacks

He said some of the cases referred to allegations of illegal pushbacks at the border but gave no further details of the circumstances. Two incidents of these alleged migrant rights violations occurred in Greece in 2025, nine in 2024 and one in 2023.

Officials at the Greek coast guard and police, responsible for the sea and land borders, were not immediately available to respond to questions about the 12 cases. A coast guard official said staff operate “with a high sense of responsibility, and with full respect for human lives and human rights”.

In January, the European Court of Human Rights found violations of human rights by Greece over a case at its land border with Turkey, referring in its ruling to a “systematic practice of pushbacks”.

Any disciplinary action over rights violations would be up to the Greek national authorities.

Frontex, which has also been accused by rights groups in the past of complicity in illegal pushbacks, is undergoing reforms and has warned states, including Greece, that if they fail to report potential rights violations, co-financing may be withheld.

Coast Guard’s Role

Greece’s coast guard has rescued over 250,000 people since 2015, when the country was at the frontline of Europe’s migration crisis. Thousands of others have died at sea, according to the U.N. refugee agency.

Frontex’s financing of Greek maritime operations was cut last year due to broader operational budget constraints but the agency still engages with Greek authorities, insisting on reforms, said Borowski.

“Frontex has changed how it engages with member states. We no longer supply resources unquestioningly,” he said. “(We)insist on standards and expect action.”

(With inputs from Reuters)

Germany Set To Seal Coalition Deal Amid U.S. Tariff Tensions

Germany Set To Seal Coalition Deal Amid U.S. Tariff Tensions

Germany’s conservatives, led by chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz, are close to finalizing a coalition deal with the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) on Tuesday. The potential government aims to boost growth in Europe’s largest economy, despite global challenges.

Two sources told Reuters that decisive talks could take place on Tuesday and a deal could be reached on Wednesday, echoing a Bild newspaper report saying there was determination to reach a deal on Tuesday.

Merz’s Christian Democrats (CDU) will head the new administration alongside their Bavarian CSU sister party, with the SPD as junior partner.

The government will take charge at a time of global turbulence in an escalating trade war sparked by U.S. President Donald Trump’s sweeping import tariffs, which could stoke inflation and have raised fears of a global recession.

Merz, who called Trump’s U.S. an unreliable ally after winning the election in February, has also vowed to build up defence spending as Europe faces a hostile Russia, and to support businesses struggling with high costs and weak demand.

German economic institutes have cut back their forecast for this year’s growth to 0.1% from the 0.8% they had expected in September, sources told Reuters on Tuesday.

Blow To The Economy

Germany has endured two years of contraction already and the tariffs are a sharp blow to its highly export-focused economy.

Merz’s coalition would be the only possible two-party majority that excludes the far-right Alternative for Germany, which all other parties have pledged to shun, even though it came second in the election.

Merz this week told Reuters that Trump’s tariffs underscored the need for Germany to rebuild its competitiveness, after a bruising period in which the AfD drew level with his conservatives in an opinion poll for the first time.

Soon after winning the election, Merz pushed through a constitutional amendment that would allow him to unleash a borrowing bonanza to fund a big boost in defence and infrastructure spending.

But the move, while providing his new government with a massive windfall, received criticism from some of his own supporters for pivoting away from a promise of fiscal rigour.

In a new poll by the Forsa institute, 60% of respondents said Merz was not fit to be chancellor, including 28% of CDU/CSU voters.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Ousted Bangladesh PM Hasina Vows Return To Probe Attacks On Her Party Members

Sheikh Hasina, ousted Prime Minister of Bangladesh and Chairperson of Bangladesh Awami League, speaks during a meeting with foreign observers and journalists at the Prime Minister's residence in Dhaka, Bangladesh, January 8, 2024. REUTERS/Mohammad Ponir Hossain/ File Photo

Bangladesh‘s ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who is currently in India, has assured her Awami League party members that she will return to her country and investigate the allegations of attacks and torture on her party members.

Bangladesh’s interim government, led by Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus, has been seeking her extradition from India.

Hasina, facing violent protests against her regime over a job quota issue, fled to India on August 5, 2024, ending her newly elected term midway. Hasina has addressed her party workers virtually on several occasions since then.

During the video conference on Monday, Hasina vowed to return to Bangladesh.

“That is why Allah has kept me alive. Don’t worry. I am coming,” she was quoted as saying by Mint.

The online event was reportedly attended by All European Awami League President Mohammad Nazrul Islam.

Islam was quoted as saying during the conversation: “Justice will happen one day. That day is not far away.”

The discussion took place for over an hour.

She targeted Yunus and his regime during the virtual meeting.

“We did not treat our opponents like this. But Yunus (is doing it) to consolidate power,” Hasina was quoted as saying.

Hasina said, “Those who committed this heinous act must be tried in Bangladesh. We will do that. I tell the families of the martyrs, please be patient.”

Bangladesh Polls

Last month, Yunus said his administration is not planning to ban the ousted former PM Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League.

However, Yunus said those individuals in the party who are within its leadership role and face accusations of committing crimes, including murder and crimes against humanity, will be tried in Bangladesh’s courts.

He said the government has not ruled out referring Awami League leaders to the International Criminal Court in The Hague following a UN fact-finding mission that reported potential crimes during the July uprising, reported Dhaka Tribune.

“It is very much on the table,” Yunus said.

He made the remark while meeting a delegation from the International Crisis Group led by Dr Comfort Ero.

He informed the delegation that the group had set two possible timelines for elections.

Explaining the dates, he said if political parties seek a limited number of reforms prior to elections, then the country will witness December polls.

He said the election will be held in June next year if a large reform package is desired.

“We have no reason to change the election dates,” he was quoted as saying by Dhaka Tribune.

(With inputs from IBNS)

Iran Wary Ahead Of Upcoming U.S. Nuclear Talks, Say Officials

Iran

Iran is heading into nuclear talks with the United States this weekend with caution and limited expectations, as Iranian officials expressed strong doubts about any progress and mistrust toward U.S. intentions, they told Reuters on Tuesday.

The talks were announced on Monday by U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly threatened Washington’s old foe Iran with military action if it does not agree to a deal since he returned to the White House in January.

Trump has said the talks on Saturday in Oman will be direct but Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi repeated on Tuesday Tehran’s position that they should be indirect, citing what he called U.S. pressure and threats.

“Indirect negotiations can guarantee a genuine and effective dialogue,” he told Iranian state news agency IRNA.

Araqchi said the talks would be led by him and Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, mediated by Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi.

Tehran Expects Positive Gestures

Tehran would want to see concrete gestures from the United States before any face-to-face talks between Iranian and U.S. officials, Iranian and regional sources said.

“The Iranians told us that direct talks are possible but there has to be a goodwill gesture. Lift some sanctions or unfreeze some money,” a regional diplomat said.

Russia backs either direct or indirect talks between Iran and the U.S. as a chance to de-escalate tensions, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday, adding: “We know that certain contacts, direct and indirect, are planned in Oman.”

Russia’s lower house of parliament also ratified on Tuesday a 20-year strategic partnership with Iran, a sign of the deepening military ties between the two countries.

Efforts to settle a dispute over Iran’s nuclear programme, which it says is purely for civilian use but which Western countries see as a precursor to an atomic bomb, have ebbed and flowed for more than 20 years without resolution.

Trump tore up a 2015 deal between Iran and six world powers – the U.S., Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany – during his first term of office in 2017 and talks since then have stalled.

Tensions Over Trump’s Warnings

With the Middle East aflame since 2023 with wars in Gaza and Lebanon, strikes in Yemen, exchanges of fire between Iran and Israel and regime change in Syria, Trump’s warnings of military action have jangled nerves across the oil-exporting region.

In Tehran, Trump’s warnings are seen as a way to box the Islamic Republic into accepting concessions in the talks Trump demands or face air strikes, three Iranian officials said.

They said the U.S. wanted to push other issues too, including Iranian influence across the Middle East and its ballistic missiles programme, which they said were off the table.

“Trump wants a new deal: end Iran’s regional influence, dismantle its nuclear programme, and halt its missile work. These are unacceptable to Tehran. Our nuclear programme cannot be dismantled,” a senior Iranian official said.

“Our defence is non-negotiable. How can Tehran disarm when Israel has nuclear warheads? Who protects us if Israel or others strike?” said another official.

Israel, which has long regarded Iran as its biggest regional threat, defeated Tehran’s Lebanese ally Hezbollah last year and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was with Trump on Monday when the U.S. president announced Saturday’s talks.

Netanyahu, who has repeatedly urged U.S. governments to use strikes against Iran’s nuclear programme, said a diplomatic solution would be good if it was done “in a full way”, citing the complete dismantling of Libya’s atomic programme.

Iran has pushed back against Trump’s warnings of military action, saying it will not be cowed by threats.

The Islamic Republic has withstood repeated sanctions programmes over recent decades and Iranian military leaders have previously threatened to cut off regional oil exports – a significant proportion of global energy supply.

(With inputs from Reuters)

President Droupadi Murmu Receives ‘City Key Of Honour’ In Lisbon

President Droupadi Murmu Receives ‘City Key Of Honour’ In Lisbon

President Droupadi Murmu received the ‘City Key of Honour’ of Lisbon during an event held at Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (City Hall) on Monday.

Speaking on the occasion, President Murmu thanked the Mayor and the people of Lisbon for the gesture.

She said that Lisbon is known for its open-mindedness, the warmth of its people and its culture, along with tolerance and respect for diversity.

She was happy to note that Lisbon is a global city that is at the forefront of technological change, innovation, digital public infrastructure and digital transition. She said that in these areas India and Portugal could further cooperate.

Murmu attended a banquet hosted in her honour by the President of the Republic of Portugal, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, at Palacio da Ajuda.

In her banquet remarks, Murmu said that the cultural ties between our peoples span centuries, and these ties have left an indelible mark on our collective imagination.

“These include our shared past which is reflected in architecture, historical sites and languages, as well as our cuisines,” she said.

Murmu said that this year holds special significance as we celebrate 50 years of India-Portugal bilateral relations.

“With our natural synergy and potential for cooperation in diverse fields, our historic ties are firmly on their way to becoming a dynamic and visionary partnership,” Murmu said.

India-Portugal Cooperation

Murmu said she was happy to note the steady and progressive growth in India-Portugal cooperation in various fields, including science and technology, defence, IT, start-ups, research, educational and cultural cooperation.

Murmu said that as a knowledge-based economy, India is harnessing its strengths in areas such as science and technology, information and communication technology, digital public infrastructure, start-ups and innovation to create an inclusive and sustainable development model that benefits all. She stated that India considers Portugal as its partner in these efforts.

The President appreciated Portugal’s role in promoting India’s relations with the European Union.

She highlighted that it was during Portugal’s Presidency of the European Union that the first India-EU Summit was held in 2000, and in May 2021, once again under the Portuguese Presidency, the historic “India-EU Plus 27” Leadership Summit took place in Portugal.

The President expressed confidence that India-Portugal bilateral relations will become even closer and broader in the times to come, and it will be beneficial not only for our people but for the entire world.

(With inputs from IBNS)

Russia Drives Away Ukrainian Forces From Last Footholds In Kursk, Says Army

Kursk

Russia is nearing full control of its western Kursk region after driving away Ukrainian troops from one of their last footholds there, according to the regional governor and reports from state media on Tuesday.

Russia’s Defence Ministry released video of what it said was the recapture of the settlement of Guyevo set to dramatic music, showing smoke rising into the air from various buildings, a soldier waving the Russian flag from the window of a heavily damaged Orthodox church, and Russian troops carrying out house-to-house checks in case any Ukrainian soldiers were hiding.

Reuters was able to verify the location of the video from file and satellite imagery of the area, but not the date.

There was no immediate comment from Ukraine.

Russia has been trying to eject Ukrainian forces from Kursk since August last year after Kyiv’s troops mounted a surprise incursion that embarrassed President Vladimir Putin and which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hoped would give him a bargaining chip in any future talks.

But Russia has retaken a swath of territory inside Kursk in recent weeks, pushing Ukrainian forces closer towards the border. It has also begun to take territory in Ukraine’s neighbouring Sumy region after Putin spoke of the possibility of carving out a buffer zone.

Governor Hopeful To Regain Control ‘Very Soon’

Alexander Khinshtein, the governor of Kursk who was appointed by President Vladimir Putin in December, said the raising of Russia’s flag in Guyevo meant Russian forces were on course to regain control of the region “very soon”.

Citing an unnamed source in the military, the state TASS news agency said that Russian forces only had to push Ukrainian troops out of two more settlements – Gornal and Oleshnya – in order to retake the entire region.

The Defence Ministry said its forces had defeated Ukrainian troops in fighting around the two settlements, but suggested they remained under Ukrainian control. Reuters could not verify the battlefield claims.

Ukraine’s authoritative DeepState war map shows Ukraine in control of about 58 square kilometres (22 square miles) of Russian territory in Kursk, down from as much as 1,400 square kilometres claimed by Kyiv last year.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed for the first time on Monday that Ukrainian troops have also been active in Russia’s adjacent Belgorod region.

He said the aim of Ukrainian activity in Russia’s border areas was to protect Ukraine’s Sumy and Kharkiv regions from Russian aggression and said that “the war must return to where it came from”.

Russia’s war in Ukraine has left hundreds of thousands of dead and injured, displaced millions of people, reduced towns to rubble and triggered the sharpest confrontation for decades between Moscow and the West.

Russian commander Apti Alaudinov was quoted by the state RIA news agency as saying on Friday that the situation in the Belgorod region was “under control” after the Ukrainian army tried to break through the border around two weeks ago.

(With inputs from Reuters)

India Overhauls Himalayan Buddhist Monastery Education To Counter China

President Droupadi Murmu Receives ‘City Key Of Honour’ In Lisbon

India is set to launch its first school curriculum for Buddhist monasteries this month, aiming to standardise education and promote patriotism in Himalayan religious centres near the China border.

Home to many ancient monasteries, as the birthplace of Buddhism, India received an influx of Tibetans in the 1950s that led to many new institutions being set up, but now it seeks to insulate religious learning from China’s influence.

“We are trying to inculcate Indian identity through education along with Buddhism to make sure China can never control our monasteries in the Himalayas,” said Maling Gombu, a Buddhist worker of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

“Thousands of children living and studying in remote monasteries deserve education recognised and certified by India,” added Gombu, one of a team promoting Indian Buddhist traditions and national education in Arunachal Pradesh.

The border state is claimed by China, but New Delhi rejects this.

Buddhist Traditions

About 600 monasteries scattered across the northern states of Sikkim, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and the regions of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh offer training in four types of Tibetan and Indian Buddhist traditions.

They also teach modern subjects and English, but the courses lack consistency outside a national education effort that aims to weld an overarching identity from India’s patchwork of languages and religions.

“The non-religious education taught by monks or nuns is not acknowledged outside monasteries,” said Rajeev Kumar Singh, a director of the education ministry’s National Institute of Open Schooling.

Singh, who has worked on the new curriculum that caps a five-year assessment effort, said it hoped to prepare Indian and Tibetan students for academic life in India.

“They (Tibetans) are free to learn Tibetan history and their tradition, but they should learn about India as they reside here and require proper education to secure jobs outside monasteries.”

A government document reviewed by Reuters showed that 20 monasteries near the 3,000-km (1,860-mile) border with China have agreed to adopt the new curriculum, with the rest to be phased in later in the year.

More Time Needed

While authorities negotiate individually with monasteries to take up the syllabus, they also need time to print up new textbooks and locate teachers to staff the schools, most in sparsely populated areas, officials said.

But monks in some monasteries, such as the Gontse Garden Rabgye Ling in Arunachal Pradesh, say their syllabus, focused on Buddhist philosophy, along with modern education, is carefully curated to meet the needs of children who may become preachers.

“We don’t think the introduction of a government-mandated syllabus is required in our monastery as it can break the rhythm designed since the 1970s,” said Geshe Dondup, a religious teacher at the monastery, home to about 300 students this year.

Tens of thousands of Tibetans sought refuge in India, where their spiritual leader and Nobel Peace laureate, the Dalai Lama, fled as Chinese troops crushed an attempted uprising in their homeland in 1959.

Tibetan Refugees

About 75,000 Tibetan refugees now live in settlements managed by the Dalai Lama’s government-in-exile, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), which controls some monasteries directly, though not those outside the Tibetan tradition.

Reuters reviewed the first batch of textbooks prepared for monasteries by education ministry officials and Indian Buddhist scholars, which delve into India’s modern and ancient history, and the nation’s role in Tibet’s freedom struggle.

The texts also emphasise mathematics, science and computer training, besides mandatory studies in English, Hindi and the native Bhoti language.

The CTA’s education minister, Tharlam Dolma, said monastery schools have historically been managed by monks and nuns based on their funding, and the CTA lacked governance rights over them. An official in the Dalai Lama’s office did not comment.

India will begin offering funds to monasteries, run for decades by different sects of Buddhism with the help of foreign aid, to recruit teachers, pay stipends to monks and pave the way for annual examinations.

In its effort to unify school programmes, a court essentially banned Islamic schools in India’s most populous state in March last year, saying they violated constitutional secularism and ordering students moved to conventional schools.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, a home ministry official said streamlining education in monasteries in far-flung strategic areas was part of a larger plan to fence off religious institutions from China’s influence.

A home ministry spokesperson did not respond to an email seeking comment.

Last year, the Asian giants began unwinding a military standoff on their disputed border since clashes in 2020 killed two dozen troops, but India aims to spend more to develop border areas amid the slow thaw in ties.

(With inputs from Reuters)

More Countries Will Get Nuclear Weapons: Russian Ex-President Medvedev

Russia's Deputy head of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev takes part in a wreath laying ceremony marking Defender of the Fatherland Day at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier by the Kremlin Wall in Moscow, Russia, February 23, 2024. Sputnik/Yekaterina Shtukina/Pool via REUTERS

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned on Tuesday that more countries would acquire nuclear weapons in the coming years, accusing the West of driving the world toward the brink of World War Three through its proxy war against Russia in Ukraine.

Medvedev, who cast himself as a liberal moderniser when he was president from 2008-2012, now presents himself as an anti-Western Kremlin hawk. Diplomats say his remarks give an indication of thinking at the top levels of the Kremlin elite.

In a post about the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty, which he signed with then U.S. President Barack Obama in Prague in 2010, Medvedev said the risk of nuclear conflict was at an all-time high. The treaty is due to expire in February 2026.

Referring to recent statements from the leaders of France and Britain about their nuclear arsenals, the deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council chastised European powers for what he said was sabre-rattling over their “meagre strategic capabilities” and said the situation was fraught with danger.

“The situation is such that even with the complete cessation of the conflict over so-called ‘Ukraine’ nuclear disarmament, in the coming decades is impossible,” Medvedev wrote on his official Telegram channel.

“The world will create new, more destructive types of weapons, and new countries will acquire nuclear arsenals.”

Russia and the United States are by far the world’s biggest nuclear powers, with about 88% of all nuclear weapons, followed by China, France, Britain, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

(With inputs from Reuters)

WTO Reviews Staff Costs After U.S. Pauses Funding

A logo is seen at the World Trade Organization (WTO) headquarters before a news conference in Geneva, Switzerland, October 5, 2022. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo

On Tuesday, the World Trade Organization (WTO) announced that it is reviewing its staff costs following a pause in funding by the U.S.

Reuters reported on March 27 that the U.S., the top donor to the WTO budget, had paused its contributions, including unpaid dues for 2024 pending a review of its support to international bodies – in a move confirmed by the U.S. government.

Since then, trade sources told Reuters that WTO staff had been informed about incoming measures to reduce spending such as not replacing some retiring staff or short-term hires.

The WTO, which has 630 staff, said that it has no plans for fixed and regular staff reductions at this time.

New Committee Appointed

“In a recent town hall, the Director-General (Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala) informed staff that in response to the current financial climate, Senior Management is exercising fiscal prudence by curtailing or deferring expenditures as necessary,” WTO spokesperson Ismaila Dieng said in response to Reuters’ questions.

He added that a newly formed ‘Staffing Resource Needs Committee’ would review vacancies and related expenditures.

The measures come against a backdrop of recent U.S. criticism of WTO spending and five years after its top court was paralysed under Trump’s first term, amid U.S. concerns about overreach.

‘Systemic Concerns’

A U.S. delegate previously raised budget concerns about a meeting to mark the 30th anniversary of the organisation which is now grappling with the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on global trade.

Washington will also raise “systemic concerns” about the WTO’s actions at a meeting on Wednesday, an agenda document showed.

“… It has become readily apparent that the (WTO) Secretariat is moving away from its Member-driven purposes, and is attempting to re-invent itself into a resource to be provided to the public, regardless of Members’ views or the impact that such activities may be having on Members’ interests or budget contributions,” a U.S. delegation document showed.

The WTO budget of 205 million Swiss francs ($239.99 million) is smaller than many other global bodies, some of which have been badly hit by Trump’s spending cuts.

Delegates say that it would theoretically be easy for any one of the WTO’s 166 members to entirely block the next budget later this year since such decisions must be taken by consensus.

A spokesperson for the U.S. mission in Geneva did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

($1 = 0.8542 Swiss francs)

(With inputs from Reuters)

Tariff Tension And A Call To Speed Up India-U.S. BTA Talks

India US BTA

Following the Trump administration’s imposition of reciprocal tariffs, India and the U.S. are making efforts to accelerate negotiations for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA).

Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio held a phone conversation on Monday. This was the first call since President Trump’s announcement of reciprocal tariffs.

The Tariffs Announcement & April 9

The announcement came as part of a broader trade policy that sees U.S. tariffs on all Indian imports set at 26%. The initial round, a 10% base tariff, was enforced on April 5, with the rest is set to take effect on April 9.

This move rattled financial markets globally, with India’s Sensex and Nifty plummeting over 3% on Monday. In the midst of this volatility, India has refrained from retaliating with counter-tariffs. Instead, it has been focusing on the BTA, hoping that a successful deal could mitigate the effects of these tariffs.

In their call, both Jaishankar and Rubio agreed on the urgency of concluding the BTA fast. Jaishankar expressed optimism, noting on social media: “Good to speak with US Secretary of State Rubio today. [We] agreed on the importance of the early conclusion of the Bilateral Trade Agreement. [I] look forward to remaining in touch.”

About BTA

The BTA is seen as key to reducing trade barriers and deepening the economic partnership between India and the US.
India’s main concern is how the new tariffs could impact key export sectors. Industries like textiles, automotive and machinery are heavily reliant on access to U.S. markets.

A study by the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) warned that India’s exports to the U.S. could decline by as much as $5.76 billion this year if the tariffs remain in place.

The U.S. is also seeking greater access to Indian markets for American goods. The Trump administration has long criticized India’s tariffs on U.S. products, especially in sectors like agriculture, electronics and medical devices.

U.S. State Department Statement

According to US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce, both sides underlined the strength of the US-India strategic partnership and acknowledged the need for progress toward a “fair and balanced” trade relationship. The discussions between Jaishankar and Rubio also touched on broader regional issues, including cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, the Indian subcontinent and other global areas of mutual interest.

India Focuses On Discussion, Not Retaliation

India has not retaliated against the tariffs, a decision that aligns with the U.S. Treasury Secretary’s advice to avoid escalating. In a recent interview, the Treasury Secretary warned against counter-tariffs, urging affected countries to “sit back” and “take it in”. The U.S. is also engaged in trade disputes with other major economies, including China. It has imposed retaliatory tariffs on Beijing, increasing concerns about a global trade war.

The growing uncertainty in global markets has led experts to believe that a well-negotiated BTA could offer a steadying effect, especially for India. Indian exports to the U.S. have been significantly impacted by earlier tariff hikes.

While the U.S. has placed the burden of tariffs on India, Indian officials are optimistic that an agreement could bring about a much-needed reduction in tariffs and broader access for American goods in Indian markets.

India’s Commerce Ministry has stated that it is closely studying the implications of the tariffs and remains focused on finalising the first phase of the BTA by the end of 2025. If successful, the agreement could provide a strategic economic advantage, not only softening the impact of tariffs but also boosting India’s global trade standing.

Amidst Geopolitical Churn, Modi To Visit Saudi Arabia

Modi saudi arabia visit

The focus will be on defence and security, trade and investments, and visa-related matters during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Saudi Arabia later this month (likely on April 22-23).

A key aspect of this bilateral engagement is growing defence cooperation, underscored by joint exercises and increased military exchanges.

Maritime Security & Defence Cooperation

The deepening defence relationship is represented by joint naval exercises and increasing military expertise exchanges. The upcoming third edition of the Al-Mohed Al Hindi naval exercise reflects this growing partnership.

The first such exercise took place in August 2021, followed by a successful drill in May 2023. These exercises provide the Indian Navy with strategic leverage, particularly in the region stretching from the Strait of Hormuz to the Strait of Malacca.

“These military exercises reflect the growing recognition of India as a trusted defence partner,” a senior officer told StratNews Global.

The bilateral defence collaboration includes India’s $225 million artillery ammunition deal with Saudi Arabia. This followed an $80 million agreement in 2023. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030, which seeks to localise 50% of its defence expenditure, offers significant opportunities for India.

Ties with Saudi Arabia have also expanded through joint exercises across domains. The first joint land force exercise Sada Tanseeq took place in Rajasthan in early 2024. “The focus was to enable the Indian and Saudi armies to share best practices in tactics, techniques and procedures for operations in the sub-conventional zone,” according to a military official.

Additionally, Saudi Arabia has shown interest in India’s defence training facilities. Over the past two years, 80 Saudi naval cadets have been trained in India.

These growing defence engagements contribute not only to bilateral security but also to regional stability in West Asia. Both countries are committed to safeguarding maritime trade routes and securing global chokepoints, which are crucial to the global economy.

During Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Riyadh in 2019, both countries emphasized the importance of securing waterways in the Indian Ocean and the Gulf. The upcoming visit will expand this to include cybersecurity, combating transnational crimes and ensuring the freedom of navigation.

India-Saudi Growing Relations

“There has been intense engagement with Saudi Arabia since the G20 summit in New Delhi. We are seeing high-level visits from both sides, including those of ministers of commerce and defence. These discussions are laying the groundwork for long-term security cooperation,” says Suhel Ajaz Khan, India’s Ambassador to Riyadh.

The Indian diaspora in Saudi Arabia contributes to this partnership. Over 2.65 million Indians live in Saudi Arabia, engaged in sectors such as construction, services and technology.
“The Indian community’s contribution to the economic development of Saudi Arabia is widely recognised,” Ambassador Khan highlighted. The National Skill Development Corporation is helping Indian workers meet Saudi Arabia’s evolving workforce needs.

On the economic front, Modi’s visit is expected to focus on enhancing trade and investments in various sectors, including tourism, renewable energy, shipping and sports. As India accelerates its infrastructure development, both nations see substantial potential for collaboration.

Md. Muddassir Quamar, Associate Professor at the Centre for West Asian Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University, observed: “Saudi Arabia has initiated mega projects to develop and augment physical infrastructure and is inviting investments from across the globe.” India, with its growing infrastructure expertise, is well-positioned to play a key role here.

Connectivity & IMEC

Another important topic of discussion during Modi’s visit will be the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).

“IMEC is expected to play a pivotal role in transforming Saudi Arabia into a global logistical hub, bridging Asia and Europe,” said Quamar. Both countries are expected to explore ways to expedite its implementation, further strengthening bilateral ties and contributing to regional economic stability.

Visa-related matters will also be a topic of concern. Ahead of Modi’s visit, Saudi Arabia temporarily suspended the issuance of Umrah, business and family visit visas for citizens of 14 countries, including India, effective until mid-June 2025. This suspension is linked to overcrowding and safety concerns during Hajj.

Saudi Arabia’s growing interest in India spans several sectors, including pharmaceuticals. Companies like Dr. Reddy’s and MSN Labs are increasing their presence in the kingdom. This sector, along with food imports and textiles, is set to boost bilateral trade further.

US Supreme Court Allows Trump To Resume Deportations Under 1798 Law

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday allowed Donald Trump to use a 1798 wartime-era law to pursue deportations of alleged Venezuelan gang members, supporting his hardline immigration stance—though with some limitations.

The Supreme Court, in an unsigned 5-4 ruling powered by conservative justices, granted the administration’s request to lift Washington-based Judge James Boasberg’s March 15 order that had temporarily blocked the summary deportations under Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act while litigation in the case continues.

Judicial Review

Despite siding with the administration, the court’s majority placed limits on how deportations may occur, emphasising that judicial review is required.

Detainees “must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs,” the majority wrote.

The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett and the court’s three liberal justices dissented.

Trump’s administration has argued that Boasberg had encroached on presidential authority to make national security decisions.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the Rule of Law in our Nation by allowing a President, whoever that may be, to be able to secure our Borders, and protect our families and our Country, itself,” Trump wrote on social media.

Alien Enemies Act

Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act on March 15 to swiftly deport the alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang, attempting to speed up removals with a law best known for its use to intern Japanese, Italian and German immigrants during World War Two.

In Monday’s decision, the court said that to challenge the legitimacy of their detention under the Alien Enemies Act, detainees must pursue so-called habeas corpus claims in the federal judicial district where a detainee is located. That means that the proper venue for this litigation was in Texas, not the District of Columbia, the court said.

The ruling said the Supreme Court was not resolving the validity of the Trump administration’s reliance on that law to carry out the deportations.

The plaintiffs in the case “challenge the government’s interpretation of the Act and assert that they do not fall within the category of removable alien enemies. But we do not reach those arguments,” the court decided.

In a legal challenge handled by the American Civil Liberties Union, a group of Venezuelan men in the custody of U.S. immigration authorities sued on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, seeking to block the deportations.

They argued, among other things, that Trump’s order exceeded his powers because the Alien Enemies Act authorizes removals only when war has been declared or the United States has been invaded.

The law authorises the president to deport, detain or place restrictions on individuals whose primary allegiance is to a foreign power and who might pose a national security risk in wartime.

Due Process

Lee Gelernt, a lawyer with ACLU and lead counsel representing the detainees, framed the court’s decision as a win for his side.

“This ruling means we will need to start the court process over again in a different venue, but the critical point is that the Supreme Court said individuals must be given due process to challenge their removal under the Alien Enemies Act,” Gelernt said. “That is a huge victory.”

The dissenting justices, in an opinion written by liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, criticized the majority’s “dubious” conclusions in the case and for acting with just a few days of deliberation.

There is “every reason to question the majority’s hurried conclusion that habeas relief supplies the exclusive means to challenge removal under the Alien Enemies Act,” Sotomayor wrote.

Sotomayor said that federal courts called upon to review these cases going forward will probe the interpretation of the Alien Enemies Act, including whether there is an “invasion” or “predatory incursion” justifying its use, and “whether any given individual is in fact a member of Tren de Aragua.”

Requiring detainees to make individual claims across the country “risks exposing them to severe and irreparable harm,” Sotomayor wrote in part of the dissent joined by the two other liberal justices and not Barrett. One risk is that they will not know whether they will remain in detention where they are arrested or be secretly transferred to an alternative location, Sotomayor said.

“That requirement may have life or death consequences,” Sotomayor wrote.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Trump Admin Plans Daily Fines For Migrants Facing Deportation

The Trump administration is considering imposing daily fines of up to $998 on migrants facing deportation orders if they fail to leave the United States. Additionally, it plans to seize their property if the fines go unpaid, according to documents examined by Reuters.

The fines stem from a 1996 law that was enforced for the first time in 2018, during President Donald Trump’s first term in office. The Trump administration plans to apply the penalties retroactively for up to five years, which could result in fines of more than $1 million, a senior Trump official said, requesting anonymity to discuss non-public plans.

Self Deport, Or Face Consequences

In response to questions from Reuters, U.S. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that immigrants in the U.S. illegally should use a mobile app formerly known as CBP One – rebranded as CBP Home under Trump – to “self deport and leave the country now.”

“If they don’t, they will face the consequences,” McLaughlin said. “This includes a fine of $998 per day for every day that the illegal alien overstayed their final deportation order.”

DHS warned of the fines in a March 31 social media post.

Emails reviewed by Reuters show the White House has pressed U.S. Customs and Border Protection to handle the issue of penalties, property seizures for migrants who don’t pay, and the sale of their assets.

The Department of Justice’s civil asset forfeiture division could be another option for the seizures, one email said.

President Donald Trump kicked off a sweeping immigration crackdown after taking office in January, testing the bounds of U.S. law to increase arrests and deportations. The planned fines target the roughly 1.4 million migrants who have been ordered removed by an immigration judge.

White House Pressure

Trump invoked the 1996 law during his first term to levy fines of hundreds of thousands of dollars against nine migrants seeking sanctuary in churches. The administration withdrew the penalties but then proceeded with smaller fines of about $60,000 per person against at least four of the migrants, according to court records.

President Joe Biden stopped issuing the fines and rescinded related policies when he took office in 2021.

Scott Shuchart, a top ICE policy official under Biden, said migrants and their supporters could challenge the fines in court but that the threat alone could have a chilling effect.

“Their point isn’t really to enforce the law, it’s to project fear in communities,” he said.

DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The proposed asset seizures against the migrants who fail to comply with final deportation orders could impact U.S. citizens or permanent residents in their households.

The immigration advocacy group FWD.us estimates that some 10 million migrants with no legal status or temporary protections are living with U.S. citizens or permanent residents in what are known as “mixed status households.”

The steep fines could hit lower-income immigrants. An analysis of 2019 Census data by the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute found 26% of households with unauthorized immigrants had incomes below the federal poverty line.

Trump has said people with final deportation orders should be a priority for removal although many have families, jobs and established ties in the U.S.

Passing The Buck

The White House National Security Council and Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff for policy, have been pressing CBP to administer the fines and handle seizures, a CBP official wrote in a March 31 email reviewed by Reuters.

But a CBP memo a day later, also reviewed by Reuters, argued for ICE to take on the task instead. The memo said that CBP’s systems do not currently support this type of immigration fine and that upgrading it could lead to significant costs and implementation delays.

The memo anticipated CBP would need at least 1,000 new paralegal specialists, up from the current staffing of 313.

The start date for the fines remained unclear. DHS did not comment on Miller’s involvement or the technical aspects of implementing the penalties.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Pro-Palestinian Protesters Storm Israel-Linked Brand Outlets Across Bangladesh

Mob ransacked a Pizza Hut store in Bangladesh on Monday, April 7, 2025. Photo courtesy: X/Bangladesh Perspectives

Widespread pro-Palestinian protests erupted across Bangladesh on Monday, as demonstrators targeted businesses perceived to have links with Israel, including Bata, KFC, and Pizza Hut.

The unrest spanned multiple districts such as Bogra, Sylhet, Cox’s Bazar, and Chittagong, with protestors denouncing Israeli military actions in Gaza and urging a boycott of Israeli products.

In Bogra, large crowds—primarily students—gathered in the city center to express outrage over the violence in Gaza.

Protest Rally Turns Violent

The protest began with a march from several educational institutions and culminated at Satmatha, the city’s central intersection. There, demonstrators stormed a Bata outlet, shattering its glass facade.

Despite the aggression, employees managed to lock the premises and prevent further damage.

Protesters carried banners, placards, and festoons, chanting slogans condemning what they described as genocide in Palestine. The demonstration brought traffic to a standstill in several parts of the city.

Students from institutions including Govt Azizul Haque College took part in the rally under the collective banner of “General Students, Bogra,” voicing solidarity with Palestinians and denouncing Israeli policies.

In Sylhet, protestors attacked a KFC outlet in the Mirboxtula area, reportedly smashing bottles of soft drinks associated with Israeli companies, according to Bangla Tribune.

The restaurant was promptly closed, and police intervened to restore calm.

Israel-Linked Businesses Targeted

Speakers at the rallies called on both the Bangladeshi government and the United Nations to take firm action in implementing a boycott of Israeli-linked goods.

They also condemned the ongoing attacks on Palestinian civilians, including children and women, urging global solidarity against the violence.

In Cox’s Bazar, demonstrators rallied in the Kalatali area, where they threw stones at KFC and Pizza Hut signboards, shattering glass windows.

Videos circulating on social media showed large crowds involved in the vandalism, with witnesses reporting that several nearby restaurants were also affected.

Chittagong witnessed similar unrest, where protestors damaged two restaurants — KFC and Pizza Hut — during a rally near the GEC intersection.

The demonstration escalated into violence, with protestors pelting the establishments with stones, bricks, and shoes, causing significant damage to their glass storefronts.

These demonstrations, spread across several cities, reflect growing public outrage in Bangladesh over the conflict in Gaza, with calls intensifying for a nationwide boycott of Israeli-affiliated businesses and strong support for the Palestinian cause.

Dozens Arrested

Bangladeshi authorities have detained 49 individuals in connection with the recent incidents of vandalism and looting targeting shops and businesses across the country.

According to the press office of Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus, law enforcement agencies responded swiftly to the unrest and criminal activities that unfolded during protest demonstrations in several cities. So far, 49 suspects have been taken into custody.

Local police confirmed that two cases have been filed in connection with the incidents, and investigations are currently ongoing. Legal proceedings are being initiated against those found to be involved.

US Warns Citizens

Following the violence, the U.S. embassy in Dhaka issued a warning on Monday, alerting its citizens in Bangladesh about the widespread vandalism during the pro-Palestinian protests.

“U.S. citizens should practice vigilance….You should avoid demonstrations and exercise caution in the vicinity of any large gatherings,” a statement from the embassy read.

“Review personal security plans; remain aware of your surroundings, including local events; and monitor local news stations for updates,” it added.

Trump Administration Cuts Food Aid, Putting Millions At Risk, Sources Say

food assistance

The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is ending nearly all remaining food assistance to Afghanistan and Yemen, according to aid officials on Monday. The U.N. World Food Programme warned the move could be “a death sentence” for millions of people.

The cuts were among numerous aid programs terminated for more than a dozen countries – including Somalia and Syria – over the weekend by the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development, according to Sarah Charles, a former head of USAID’s humanitarian affairs bureau, and nine sources, including six current U.S. officials involved in humanitarian aid who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The total amount of aid cut was over $1.3 billion, according figures provided by Stand Up For Aid, a grassroots advocacy group. That includes $562 million for Afghanistan, $107 million for Yemen, $170 million for Somalia, $237 million for Syria and $12 million for Gaza.

The U.N. World Food Programme warned that the termination of U.S. funding for emergency food assistance “could amount to a death sentence for millions of people facing extreme hunger and starvation,” and said it was in contact with the Trump administration for more information.

In a Post on X, WFP chief Cindy McCain said funding cuts “will deepen hunger, fuel instability, and make the world far less safe.”

A State Department spokesperson referred Reuters to the White House when asked about the program terminations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said the U.N. was trying to get details on the canceled contracts.

Plan To Dismantle USAID?

The cuts are the latest piece of the Trump administration’s drive to dismantle USAID, the main U.S. humanitarian aid agency. His administration has canceled billions of dollars in life-saving programs since the Republican president began his second term on January 20.

Many of the terminated programs had been granted waivers by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio from cuts to foreign aid programs made by billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency since February, three of the sources said.

The U.S. has been the largest aid donor to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan and to Yemen, most of which is controlled by Islamist militants of the Iran-backed Houthi movement. Both countries have suffered years of devastating war.

“Every remaining USAID award for Afghanistan was terminated,” said one source. The officials said the canceled funds included assistance for a U.N. agency that helps women and girls, the WFP and at least six non-governmental organizations.

Assistance to Afghans provided by the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration also was terminated, five sources said.

The terminations will worsen the world’s humanitarian crises, putting millions of desperate people at risk of starvation, and could fuel new waves of illegal immigration, according to several sources and experts.

“Despite continued assurances that lifesaving programs would be protected during the Trump Administration’s ‘review’ of foreign assistance, DOGE spent the weekend canceling aid that the administration previously told Congress would be retained,” said Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

She said the end of food assistance would “have devastating consequences” and she looked forward to hearing more from Rubio.

The Most Vulnerable

Among the cuts this weekend were $169.8 million for the WFP in Somalia, covering food assistance, nutrition for malnourished babies and children and humanitarian air support. In Syria, $111 million was cut from WFP food assistance.

Nearly 23 million people, more than half of whom are children, are in need of assistance in Afghanistan, according to the U.N. The WFP says it provided emergency food and cash to nearly 12 million Afghans last year, prioritizing the help for women and girls facing “extreme hunger.”

“The Afghan awards were very carefully targeted at the most life-saving activities,” said Charles, who left USAID in January 2024. “This will be devastating to the most vulnerable in Afghanistan who are … under the thumb of the Taliban.”

The U.N. says the U.S. has so far given $206 million in assistance for Afghanistan this year. Last year, it was the largest donor – giving $736 million – to the country wrecked by decades of war that ended with the Taliban seizing power as the U.S. withdrew its last troops in August 2021.

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which focuses on sexual and reproductive health, was first told at the end of February that a $24 million two-year grant for work in Afghanistan had been terminated. At the same time, a $17 million two-year grant for work in Syria was also terminated.

Both terminations were rescinded by Washington within days. On Friday, both grants were once again terminated, UNFPA said.

Economic Instability Could Boost Extremist Groups

The cutoff of aid to Afghanistan also could unleash new economic instability as it will affect shipments of dollars to a private bank in Kabul for exchange into afghanis, the national currency, by the United Nations to fund aid operations.

The cuts may also stoke conditions that prompt people to join extremist groups like Islamic State’s Afghanistan-based branch, known as ISIS-K, U.S. officials said.

Reuters also reviewed the text of a USAID letter informing an undisclosed Yemen aid contractor that the termination was ordered by Jeremy Lewin, an acting USAID assistant administrator and a DOGE operative overseeing the dismantling of USAID, including the termination of thousands of employees.

“The decision to terminate this individual award,” the letter said, “is pursuant to a review and determination that the award is inconsistent with the Administration’s priorities.”

According to U.N. data, more than 19 million of Yemen’s 35 million people are in need of help, with some 17 million “food insecure.” The U.S., which has provided $768 million last year according to the U.N., has provided so far this year $15 million in assistance to Yemen.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Jaishankar, Rubio Discuss India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio discussed the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) on Monday.

The Jaishankar-Rubio Bilateral Trade Agreement talks took place just days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced major tariffs on several nations, including India.

The U.S. imposed 26 percent tariffs on all Indian imports.

After the meeting, S. Jaishankar wrote on X: “Good to speak with @SecRubio today.”

“Exchanged perspectives on the Indo-Pacific, the Indian Sub-continent, Europe, Middle East/West Asia and the Caribbean,” he said.

“Agreed on the importance of the early conclusion of the Bilateral Trade Agreement. Look forward to remaining in touch,” Jaishankar said.

U.S. Secretary of State Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the two leaders affirmed the strength of the U.S.-India strategic partnership and discussed opportunities to deepen collaboration in the Indo-Pacific region.

“They also discussed U.S. reciprocal tariffs on India and how to make progress toward a fair and balanced trade relationship,” Bruce said.

This was the first high-level contact between India and the US since Trump announced tariffs on April 2.

India-US Trade Agreement

As a follow up to the India-U.S. Joint Statement of 13 February 2025, wherein the two sides agreed to expand bilateral trade to reach $ 500 Billion by 2030, including through the conclusion of a Bilateral Trade Agreement, representatives of India’s Department of Commerce and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative convened in New Delhi from 26-29 March 2025.

In order to realise the shared objective of promoting growth that ensures fairness, national security and job creation, both sides have through four-days of discussions in New Delhi broadly come to an understanding on the next steps towards a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), with the goal to finalise its first tranche by fall 2025.

“Sectoral expert level engagements under the BTA will start virtually in the coming weeks and pave the path for an early negotiating round in person. During these discussions, the two sides also had a productive exchange of views on deepening bilateral cooperation in priority areas, including increasing market access, reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers and deepening supply chain integration in a mutually beneficial manner,” the Indian government said in a statement last month.

The meeting in New Delhi followed the visit of Union Commerce and Industries Minister Piyush Goyal to Washington, D.C., from March 4-6, 2025, during which he met his U.S. counterparts – U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and subsequent video conferences between the two sides.

(With inputs from IBNS)

PM Wong: US Tariffs ‘Not What Friends Do’ To Singapore

Singapore's Prime Minister Lawrence Wong speaks during a signing ceremony and press conference at the Government House, in Bangkok, Thailand, November 28, 2024. REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha/File Photo

On Tuesday, Singapore’s Prime Minister Lawrence Wong stated that the US’ 10% universal tariff rate appears unlikely to be up for negotiation and cautioned that a global escalation of trade conflicts could lead to significant disruptions in the domestic economy.

Wong in an address to parliament said there was no doubt trade-reliant Singapore’s growth would be significantly impacted, and the government would likely revise down its gross domestic product growth forecasts, but it was unclear if the city-state would go into recession this year.

The current trade ministry GDP forecast for 2025 is 1% to 3%.

Singapore Unhappy

“It doesn’t look like the 10% universal rate is open for negotiation. This seems to be the fixed minimum tariff, regardless of a country’s trade balance or existing trade arrangements,” he said.

Singapore escaped the much larger tariff rates imposed on many of its Southeast Asian neighbours last week but has taken issue with the imposition of the 10% universal rate due to its free-trade agreement with Washington.

“We are very disappointed by the U.S. move, especially considering the deep and longstanding friendship between our two countries. These are not actions one does to a friend,” Wong said, adding Singapore would not impose retaliatory tariffs.

He also said “the likelihood of a full-blown global trade war is growing”, anticipating weaker near-term global growth and reduced demand for Singapore’s goods and services.

Job Losses

He warned that if companies relocate from Singapore to the U.S., there would be job losses and retrenchments.

“The government will do everything we can to navigate through the choppy waters and ensure no one is left behind,” he added.

The United States had a goods trade surplus of $2.8 billion with Singapore last year, according to the website of the U.S. Trade Representative website states. However, Singapore Trade Minister Gan Kim Yong last week said the U.S. trade surplus with Singapore amounted to a “substantial” $30 billion in 2024.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Taiwan Open To Talks With U.S. On Tariffs At Any Time, Says Foreign Minister

Taiwan

Taiwan is ready to hold discussions with the United States on tariffs whenever needed, Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung said on Tuesday, as the island’s stock market stabilized after a sharp drop the previous day amid trade concerns.

Major semiconductor producer Taiwan, hit with a 32% duty, was singled out by U.S. President Donald Trump as among the U.S. trading partners with one of the highest trade surpluses with the country.

Taiwan President Lai Ching-te on Sunday proposed a zero-tariffs regime with the United States, and to invest more in the country and remove trade barriers.

Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of parliament, Lin said that Taiwan was ready to talk about a variety of issues with the United States, including investment in and purchases from the country and non-tariff barriers.

“As long as there is a confirmed time and method for negotiations, they can be discussed at any time with the United States,” he added.

Premier Cho Jung-tai, also speaking at parliament, said Taiwan was indeed one of those U.S. trading partners seeking talks and the government would choose an appropriate time to present Lai’s plans to the United States.

Cho’s ‘Comprehensive’ Plan

Cho declined to give details of talks with the United States, Taiwan’s most important international backer despite the lack of formal diplomatic ties.

“We definitely have a comprehensive plan, we have the right people, and we will be able to go and have positive negotiations,” he added.

Taiwan’s benchmark stock index, which logged its worst fall ever on Monday, down almost 10%, fell another 4% on Tuesday morning to its lowest level in 14 months. Shares in TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, dropped around 4%.

Shares in Foxconn, Apple’s biggest iPhone maker, dropped almost 10%, their daily down limit, extending their previous day’s drop.

While the selling pressure was unrelenting, Tuesday’s losses came as Asian stocks bounced off 1-1/2-year lows and U.S. stock futures pointed higher, with markets catching their breath after recent heavy selling on hopes that Washington might be willing to negotiate some of its aggressive tariffs.

Taiwan has repeatedly said its large trade surplus with the United States is due to soaring demand for tech, given its companies are major suppliers to companies like Apple and Nvidia.

In a statement on Tuesday, the American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan expressed its strong concern about the tariffs, and called on Washington to exempt Taiwan from trade actions that could “jeopardise the stability and trust underpinning the U.S.-Taiwan relationship”.

(With inputs from Reuters)