Former British nurse and convicted child serial killer Lucy Letby on Thursday lost an attempt to appeal against her conviction for trying to murder a newborn baby, amid questions over the fairness of her trials.
Letby, 34, was found guilty of murdering seven children and attempting to murder seven more between June 2015 and June 2016 while working in the neonatal unit of the Countess of Chester Hospital in Chester, northern England, making her Britainโs worst serial child killer of modern times.
She was convicted of an eighth count of attempted murder at a retrial earlier this year, after the original jury was unable to reach a verdict on a charge that Letby tried to kill a baby girl by removing her breathing tube.
Prosecutor Nick Johnson told Manchester Crown Court that, little more than an hour after the child was born, a senior doctor found the babyโs breathing tube dislodged and Letby standing there โdoing nothingโ.
โNot Guiltyโ
Letbyโs lawyer Benjamin Myers told Londonโs Court of Appeal on Thursday that Letby โmaintains and has maintained she is not guilty of the offencesโ.
He argued that the retrial was an abuse of process as Letby could not have a fair trial because of extensive coverage of her convictions, which featured โintense hostility towards herโ and comments made by the Crown Prosecution Service and police.
โThere was no way in which the jury in trial two were going to have the publicity and the comment and the hostility ameliorated,โ Myers said.
Courtโs Refusal
Judge William Davis refused Letbyโs application for leave to appeal against the conviction from her retrial.
Letby attended the hearing by video link from prison and sat impassively as the judge stated the courtโs reasons for refusing her application.
โThe outcome of the first trial undoubtedly led to an unusually large amount of publicity and online debate,โ Davis said. โThat is because, on its face, the case was extraordinary.โ
Letbyโs attempt to overturn her convictions from the first trial was refused in May. She can now only challenge those convictions if the Criminal Cases Review Commission refers those cases back to the Court of Appeal.
Since her trials, Letbyโs conviction has come under a spotlight, following criticism by some experts of medical and statistical evidence presented by the prosecution.
Some media have questioned whether she might be the victim of a miscarriage of justice, while a public inquiry into her crimes continues.
(with inputs from Reuters)