A U.S. judge ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration could proceed with a buyout program for federal workers, potentially removing tens of thousands from government payrolls as part of a broader initiative to reduce the size of the U.S. civil service.
The decision by U.S. District Judge George O’Toole in Boston cleared the way for the Trump administration to swiftly wrap the program up after the legal challenge delayed it for six days.
The administration said the program is now closed to new applicants.
“There is no longer any doubt: the Deferred Resignation Program was both legal and a valuable option for federal employees,” the Office of Personnel Management said in a statement.
Not The End Of Fight
Labor unions that brought the lawsuit to stop the plan did not immediately say whether they would appeal the judge’s decision or pursue other options.
O’Toole ruled the unions did not have standing to bring the lawsuit because they would not be directly affected by the program.
“Today’s ruling is a setback in the fight for dignity and fairness for public servants. But it’s not the end of that fight,” said Everett Kelly, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents 800,000 federal workers.
The buyout is one of many approaches Trump is taking to slash a civilian workforce of 2.3 million that he has blasted as ineffective and biased against him. He has also ordered government agencies to prepare for wide-ranging job cuts, and several have already begun to lay off recent hires who lack full job security.
Officials have been told to prepare staff cuts of up to 70% at some agencies, sources say.
As of Friday, about 65,000 federal employees had signed up for the buyouts, according to a White House official, equal to about 3% of the total civilian workforce.
Unions urged their members not to accept the buyout and have warned that Trump cannot be trusted to honor it.
Doubts Surrounding The Offer
The offer promises to pay employees their regular salaries and benefits until October without requiring them to work, but that may not be ironclad. Current spending laws expire on March 14, and there is no guarantee that salaries would be funded beyond that point.
Lawyers with the U.S. Department of Justice had described the initiative as a “humane off-ramp” for those frustrated by Trump’s broader plans to reduce the size of the workforce and end the ability of many to work from home.
Unions representing federal employees argued in their lawsuit that the program was “stunningly arbitrary” and violates a law that prevents agencies from spending more money than approved by Congress.
O’Toole in his ruling, in addition to saying that unions did not have standing to bring the lawsuit, wrote that disputes involving federal employees also must first be pursued through an administrative process before going to court.
Unions and Democratic attorneys general have brought several other lawsuits challenging Trump’s rapid remaking of government and won some initial victories.
In a separate lawsuit filed on Wednesday, five unions sued to block what they called a possible mass firing of hundreds of thousands of workers who resist pressure to accept the buyouts.
Layoffs Vs Congressional Budget Plan
Trump has deputized billionaire Elon Musk to head the newly created Department of Government Efficiency, which is combing through payment and personnel records in an effort to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget, which totaled $6.75 trillion last year.
Civilian worker salaries account for less than 5% of that total.
Trump has ordered federal agencies to work with Musk’s team to identify employees who can be laid off and functions that can be eliminated entirely.
Musk’s team has focused on 15 agencies so far and has dismantled two – one that provides a lifeline to the world’s needy and another that protects Americans from unscrupulous lenders. Some Republican budget experts say the effort reflects conservative ideology more than a good-faith effort to save taxpayer dollars.
Trump himself has ruled out cuts to popular retirement and health benefits for seniors that currently account for 36% of federal spending and are projected to eat up more of the budget as the population ages.
Trump’s Republican allies in Congress, meanwhile, are preparing a budget plan that would cut taxes and increase security spending, which independent experts say would add trillions of dollars to the national debt.
(With inputs from Reuters)
